• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
location icon香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈五樓503室phone-icon +852 2868 0696 linkedintwitterfacebook
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 繁
    • ENG
    • 简
    • FR
    • 日本語
Oldham, Li & Nie
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Send Email
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN Blue

OLN

  • Block Content Examples
  • Client Information & Registration
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Globalaw
  • OLN Podcasts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review
  • Test Blog
  • 加入我們
  • 專業服務
  • 律師團隊
  • 我們的歷史
    • 獎項與排名
    • 高李嚴律師行的企業社會責任
  • 所獲獎項
  • 標準服務條款
  • 聯繫我們
  • 評價
  • 評語
  • 辦事處
  • 關於我們
  • 高李嚴律師行
  • 高李嚴律師行和社區
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

高李嚴律師行在2021年《亞太法律500強》評選中榜上有名

OLN Marketing

高李嚴律師行在2021年《亞太法律500強》評選中榜上有名

January 14, 2021 by OLN Marketing

高李嚴律師行在2021年的《亞太法律500強》評選中榜上有名,並在其中兩個類別被評為“推薦律師事務所”,這兩個類別是:

  • 知識產權,香港
  • 勞資及僱傭,香港

高李嚴律師的兩名律師被《亞太法律500強》評為各自業務領域的“領先律師”,他們是:

  • 宋靜妍– 知識產權,香港
    • 其他重點律師:
      • 陳韻祺
      • 趙君宜
      • 楊素滿
  • 陳韻祺– 勞資及僱傭,香港
    • 其他重點律師:
      • 吳光懋

兩名律師都被《亞太法律500強》的研究員給予良好的評價。詳情可到《亞太法律500強》的官方網站得到更多資訊: https://www.legal500.com/firms/30993-oldham-li-nie/30842-hong-kong-hong-kong/?layout=asia-pacific&token=d9d71f53ac6572f267a067cd8f62ee64

Filed Under: 最新消息

高李嚴律師行榮登2021年《錢伯斯亞太》榜單

December 18, 2020 by OLN Marketing

由國際權威法律評級機構錢伯斯(Chambers and Partners)評選得出的《2021亞太法律指南》及《2021國際法律指南》榜單正式公佈; 高李嚴律師行再次榮登《錢伯斯亞太》榜單。

2021國際法律指南

上榜業務類別:

  • 公司/併購: 香港獨立律師事務所 – 第三等
  • 爭議解決(國際律師事務所),香港- 受認可律師事務所

上榜律師類別:

  • 高國峻,公司/併購 -業界元老
  • 葉琳寶, 公司/併購 – 第二等
  • 李卓賢, 爭議解決 – 第四等
  • 宋靜妍, 知識產權 – 受認可律師事務所

2021亞太法律指南

上榜業務類別:

  • 公司/併購: 香港獨立律師事務所 – 第三等
  • 家事法(國際律師事務所) – 第三等

上榜律師類別:

  • 高國峻, 公司/併購 -業界元老
  • 葉琳寶, 公司/併購 – 第二等
  • 李卓賢, 爭議解決 – 第四等
  • 施偉勳, 家事法- 第三等

關於《錢伯斯》的排名

《錢伯斯》的排名為全球和亞太地區的最佳律師事務所和律師提供了可靠的建議。過去30多年來,錢伯斯一直是法律市場情報的主要來源。特別是在亞太地區的排名中,它涵蓋了國際上最重要的法律領域,例如仲裁,資本市場和公司/併購。

Filed Under: 最新消息

OLN 晉升 Victor Ng、Jonathan Lam 和 Yvonne Kong 為合夥人,Caroline Choi 為顧問 – 註冊海外律師

December 1, 2020 by OLN Marketing

公司擴大其稅務諮詢、私人客戶和婚姻家庭法部門

2020 年 12 月 1 日(香港) – Oldham, Li & Nie (OLN) 很高興地宣布晉升,吳光懋律師、林雋溢律師和江亦媛律師為合夥人,Caroline Choi 為法律顧問(美國加州),從 1 日起生效2020 年 12 月。

吳光懋律師 (Victor Ng) – 作為雙資香港律師和香港會計師公會會員,Victor 具有獨特優勢,可為客戶提供國際稅務規劃事宜的全面建議,涵蓋涉及香港的跨境公司和商業交易及投資香港、中華人民共和國和歐盟。在他的法律職業生涯並於 2013 年作為實習生加入 OLN 之前,Victor 在德勤和普華永道工作,就香港、國際和中國的稅務事宜提供諮詢。有關 Victor 的實踐和專業領域的更多信息,請單擊此處。

林雋溢律師 (Jonathan Lam) – Jonathan 於2012 年開始在OLN 擔任實習律師,為客戶就商業糾紛提供諮詢,並曾在高等法院和上訴法院處理多起備受矚目的重大案件,涉及股東糾紛、衍生訴訟、債務追討、民事欺詐、破產和復雜的遺囑認證事宜。此外,Jonathan通過就遺產規劃、信託和遺囑認證事宜提供建議,提升了公司的私人客戶能力。有關Jonathan實踐的更多詳細信息,請單擊此處。

江亦媛律師 (Yvonne Kong) – Yvonne 於 2011 年作為實習律師加入 OLN,專攻婚姻和家庭法。她與本地和外籍客戶就離婚申請、財務申請和子女事宜廣泛合作。 Yvonne 在幫助客戶獲得收養令、子女撫養令以及針對死者遺產申請臨時財務令方面擁有豐富的經驗。有關 Yvonne 的個人資料和專業知識的更多信息,請單擊此處。

高級合夥人高國峻表示:“公司很高興將Victor、Jonathan 和Yvonne 提升為合夥人,並讓Caroline 擔任顧問- 註冊海外律師。他們通過專業精神和對客戶的承諾真正反映了OLN 的價值觀。由於許多組織已經面臨並將繼續面臨COVID-19 帶來的挑戰,因此我們對人力投資的承諾比以往任何時候都更大。擁有合適的人才、合適的技能和合適的文化是我們公司的核心,使我們能夠支持我們的客戶並在OLN 的成功基礎上再接再厲。”

關於OLN

高李嚴律師行(OLN)是一家領先的香港獨立律師事務所,自 1987 年成立以來,其對專業卓越的承諾一直是該公司的基石。 OLN 的業務領域包括:
•    公司和商業
•    爭議解決
•    離婚與家庭法
•    破產與重組
•    知識產權
•    保險
•    私人客戶服務

我們目前有45名律師,在一個或多個司法管轄區擁有執業資格,當中包括香港、法國、英國、美國、澳洲及加拿大。我們的中國業務發展蓬勃,由我們的香港及上海辦事處專責處理,並在必要時透過我們在中國的法律網絡取得協助。

吳光懋律師, 合夥人
Tax Advisory & 私人客戶服務

victor.ng@oln-law.com

林雋溢律師, 合夥人
爭議解決 & 私人客戶服務

jonathan.lam@oln-law.com

江亦媛律師, 合夥人
離婚與家庭法

yvonne.kong@oln-law.com

Filed Under: 最新消息

OLN知識產權審核清單

November 26, 2020 by OLN Marketing

本所協助客戶創立、發展及最終出售業務和企業,而常令我們感到驚訝的是知識產權總是不備受重視,儘管它往往是客戶公司最有價值的部分。

大多數人認為知識產權是指商標和設計。 事實上,它涵蓋了你的公司的的所有資產,不論是客戶價格表、許可合同、網站領域、市場推廣材料、軟件或分銷方法。

為什麼要對你的知識產權進行審核?

在進行盡職調查時,我們發現在保管商業秘密或機密資訊、以及員工使用這些資訊方面往往存在明顯漏洞。 我們亦見過無法執行或根本不存在的限制性契諾。 我們經常遇到的情況是商標已被沿用多年,但沒有在所有適用國家或相關類別中註冊。有時是有人聲稱擁有版權但卻無法證明,或發現該事物已被開發而第三方已經擁有了版權。 我們留意到大家不太花心神去保護技術訣竅,也沒有採取太多措施來管理這種專利技術的相關風險。
保護你的知識產權需要持續的努力,並隨着你的業務擴展和發展而不斷變化。 但是,第一步是透過徹底審核你的機構的商標、版權、專利、商業秘密、註冊設計、與知識產權有關的合約去評估目前屬於你的機構的知識產權,並對上述所有知識產權資產進行優勢、劣勢、機會和威脅分析 (”SWOT 分析” )。

我們審核知識產權的固定費用方案

作為驅使我們協助客戶保護其知識產權的其中一個動力,我們以固定費用,根據你的企業規模和特性去度身訂造一套穩健的方案審核你的知識產權。

聯絡我們:如果你想進一步瞭解我們的知識產權審核服務,請聯絡客戶關係經理Liz Kenyon (liz.kenyon@oln-law.com),或營運總監Ruby Ng (ruby.ng@oln-law.com)。

OLN知識產權審核清單©中的48個問題* 

商標

•    你的業務使用什麼品牌名稱、口號及/或標誌? 你知道你可以為一個聲音、顏色或動作註冊嗎?
•    你有否在全部現有業務或打算在將來發展業務的國家申請註冊貴司的商標? 你是否選擇了正確的類別?
•    你的公司的商標甚麼時候到期更新?
•    你的公司的主要網站領域是否已經做了註冊?誰負責維持這些主要網站領域?你有沒有任何正在使用和已被註冊的中文標記是與你的英文文字標記相對應的,尤其是在中國做生意的你?

版權
•    如果你的品牌如此重要,你要怎樣去保護它?

商業秘密
•    你能辨別出具有商業價值的機密資料(例如客戶名單、廣告策略、分銷方法、數據合集、製作過程、配方/公式)嗎? 茶水間的Marjorie有可能進來用USB帶走你所有的資訊並一走了之嗎? 你的員工能夠重建你的業務嗎?
•    你的公司採取了甚麼措施去保護這些商業秘密(例如保密協議、防火牆、唯讀、限制權限)? 
•    有沒有限制只允許有需要的員工去接觸這些商業秘密? 你每隔多久才進行檢閱?
許可合同
•     你的公司有沒有任何許可合同?
聘用及獨立承包商合同
•    你有沒有審核過你的工司的聘用及獨立承包商合同,以確保有足夠條款監管由僱員/承包商向公司轉讓的知識產權?
 

其他合同
•    你的公司有否簽訂過任何特許經營協議、特許權使用費協議、市場推廣協議、分銷協議、諮詢協議、外判協議?如果有,你有沒有檢查過這些協議?

評估及管理風險
•    你的公司有否用簿册記錄這些合同?關於知識產權,誰是你的左右手? 把所有合同集中在一個地方是不是一個好主意?

SWOT 分析

我們亦會對你的知識產權進行SWOT分析:

•    S (Strengths) – 你的知識產權有甚麼優勢?
•    W (Weaknesses) – 你的知識產權有甚麼弱點?
•    O (Opportunities) – 有甚麼機遇?
•    T (Threats) –有甚麼可見的威脅?

*我們會為客戶免費提供完整的調查表。

Filed Under: 知識產權法

SPAC or Not To SPAC: An Alternative Route to Go Public Without an IPO (I)

November 16, 2020 by OLN Marketing

SPACs have made a comeback in the equity capital market in recent years, particularly in 2020 where the global economy is adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. What are SPACs, what do they do and why are they becoming so popular? Part I of this article will discuss the history and characteristics of SPAC, where and how they get listed. Part II will focus more on what investors get from investing in SPACs and what SPACs do with the money raised. 

History and characteristics of SPAC

SPAC, also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Company, is a company established solely for the purpose of raising capital through IPOs. SPAC is not a newly developed vehicle or concept, it has been around for some decades and there have been ups and downs for SPACs. Recently, there has been an increase in the number of SPAC IPOs. Total funds raised jumped from approximately US$3.5 billion through 13 SPAC IPOs in 2016 to approximately US$13.6 billion through 59 SPAC IPOs in 2019 and so far in 2020, there has been 178 SPAC IPOs raising a total of approximately US$64.8 billion1. The average SPAC IPO size also increased from less than US$250 million to approximately US$370 million in 2020. The SPACs and SPAC IPOs referred to in this article generally refer to those in the US market.

The main difference between a SPAC and other companies that raise funds through IPOs is that SPACs have no commercial operations at the time of listing. There is only one purpose of the listing of a SPAC and that is to raise funding for its business combination, merger with or acquisition of other private operating companies post-IPO such that the private operating company would be able to achieve a listing status without the need to go through the traditional lengthy IPO process. The post-IPO acquisition of or business combination with the private business by a SPAC is generally known as the “de-SPAC transaction”.

SPACs have always been viewed as an alternate route for private operating companies which otherwise may not satisfy listing requirements or find the traditional IPO route too costly and time consuming to go public. SPAC acquires private companies with funds raised from its IPO to achieve this. SPACs offer investors a chance to invest in a fund which are then used to acquire one or more target businesses after the SPAC IPO. The target businesses are usually not identified prior to the IPO to avoid extensive disclosures during the listing process and generally there is a statement in the IPO prospectus specifically to inform investors that there is no identified business combination, acquisition or merger targets nor substantive discussion with any potential target has been initiated. This is why SPACs are also referred to as “blank check companies”, since investors in the IPO do not know which company will ultimately receive their money. 

Where can SPACs go for an IPO? 

The United States stock exchanges such as New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ have been the popular choice for SPAC IPOs. Certain stock exchanges in the UK (London Stock Exchange) and Europe (Euronext Paris, Euronext Amsterdam) also welcome listing by SPACs but the number of IPOs are not comparable with that in the US. In Asia, several countries accept listing of SPACs, including Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea. The number of IPOs and the capital raised in these Asian countries are not comparable with that in the United States. While the timeframe for US listed SPACs to complete the subsequent merger is 18-24 months, SPACs listed in Malaysia and South Korea are generally allowed up to 36 months after the IPO to complete the merger. 

What are the criteria for a SPAC to get listed and the structure of the listing? 

A SPAC IPO in the US will typically consist of “units” where each unit usually consists of a share of common stock and a fraction of a warrant to acquire a share of common stock in the SPAC. The warrant is normally exercisable after the de-SPAC transaction. The sponsor of SPAC will typically retain around 20% of the shares in the SPAC known as “founder shares” at a nominal consideration. This allows the sponsor to achieve a fairly high return regardless of the value of the SPAC. However, there is a major change in the investment structure of a recent SPAC IPO in the US, where the sponsor does not acquire any founder shares at nominal consideration but rather acquire sponsor warrants which are not exercisable until a certain period of time after completion of the de-SPAC transaction at the fair market value. This arrangement substantially reduced the dilution effect on the investors’ interests which makes the investment more attractive to investors when compared with investing in traditional SPACs2 .

There are generally a few criteria built into the structure to protect public investors including:

  1. a deadline for SPACs to conclude its first business combination or acquisition, typically within 18 to 24 months (maybe extendable);
  2. a right for investors to approve the proposed target business and/or a right for investors to have their shares redeemed by SPACs;
  3. a requirement for the IPO proceeds to be held in a segregated trust account; and 
  4. minimum deal value requirements (e.g. where the SPACs is listed on the NYSE, the fair market value of the target company(ies) must equal at least 80% of the SPACs’ assets in the trust account at the time of signing the definitive agreement of business combination/merger/acquisition.)

Disclaimer: Nothing in this article is meant to be or shall be construed as any legal advice on Hong Kong, US or the laws of any other jurisdictions referred to in this article or as any legal advice on SPACs to any person.   

1 SPAC Statistics by SPAC Insider
2 Prospectus of Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd.

Filed Under: 公司和商業法

SPAC or Not To SPAC: An Alternative Route to Go Public Without an IPO (II)

November 16, 2020 by OLN Marketing

In Part I of this article, we have examined the history of SPACs, let’s now turn to examine what investors get from investing in a SPAC, what SPACs do with the money raised and what the future looks for SPACs.

What are investors investing in and what do they get?

In a typical SPAC IPO, the SPAC is a newly incorporated company and does not have any operating history, financials nor performance record. What do investors base their investment decisions on then? In traditional IPOs, the listing vehicle will have operating history and a particular operating business, whether or not the company has been operating in profit in the past is not necessarily a key criterion depending on where the company proposes to list its shares. The company will need to disclose in the prospectus matters such as its business, financial performance, risks involved so that potential investors will be able to have an understanding of how good or bad the company has been performing and assess its future prospects before making an investment decision. 

For a SPAC, no such information is available to investors as the SPAC is only a shell company. What they have, on the other hand, is a management team and an investment team typically with experiences in specific industries or sectors which the SPAC intends to acquire potential targets with capital raised from the IPO. Further, in a SPAC prospectus, there is no information on any potential targets of business combination or acquisition because stating the potential target would mean information on the target will be required to be disclosed as in any traditional IPO of companies with operating history. Hence, what investors invest in is not any specific operating company but rather their trust and confidence in the management team and investment team of the SPAC and their experiences in finding a most suitable target for business combination, merger or acquisition and bring it public.  

In return for their investment, investors receive units of the SPACs, with each unit comprising a share of common stock and a fraction of a warrant to purchase a share of common stock after completion of the de-SPAC transaction. Shareholders are generally given the right to approve or reject any proposed de-SPAC transaction. The SPAC will provide its shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares upon the completion of the de-SPAC transaction either (i) in a shareholder meeting called to approve the proposed de-SPAC transaction or (ii) by means of a tender offer. Whether the SPAC will seek shareholders’ approval of a proposed de-SPAC transaction or conduct a tender offer will be made by the SPAC at its sole discretion taking into account factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would require the SPAC to seek shareholders’ approval by law or pursuant to regulatory requirements. Upon a de-SPAC transaction, shareholders can choose to maintain their investment in the newly acquired or merged company or redeem their shares.

What do SPACs do with all the moneys raised?

The capital raised by SPACs through IPOs are held in a trust. Usually, after setting aside some portions of the funds to meet the listing expenses, underwriting commission and the SPACs’ ongoing operational costs, the remaining IPO proceeds are segregated in a trust account with a third-party financial institution. The funds can only be used for the post-IPO business combination, merger with or acquisition of a target business or for the redemption of the SPAC shares upon request by the shareholders. If the business combination, acquisition cannot be achieved within the specified timeframe, i.e. 18 – 24 months after the SPAC IPO, the SPAC shall be liquidated and the funds returned to the shareholders to redeem their shares in the SPAC. 

Since SPAC shareholders have the right to request the SPAC to redeem their shares, the SPAC shall redeem the shares with the funds set aside in the trust account upon receiving such request. A huge number of shareholders requesting redemption of SPAC shares means that a large portion of the funds in the trust account will be required to be paid out as redemption money, which the trust account may end up not having sufficient funds left to consummate any de-SPAC transaction. If the SPAC fails to raise additional financing for the de-SPAC transaction, it may end up not being able to complete the business combination, acquisition within the timeframe which will then lead to the liquidation of the SPAC.

 Future of SPACs?

Not knowing how much longer the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to affect our daily lives and the economy, particularly with the second, third or fourth wave hitting different parts of the world one after another and the record breaking high of daily new cases, it is difficult to predict market reaction to traditional IPOs and investors tend to adopt more conservative approaches in making investment decisions. While there are big name IPOs which the general public has been waiting for and current economic environment is not expected to have significant negative impact on their subscriptions, other small to mid-size IPOs are nonetheless going to be the hardest hit. Instead of going through the lengthy and costly IPO process and not knowing how well-received by the public their shares will be, a business combination, merger with or an acquisition by a SPAC would seem to be the more realistic way of exit of private companies. With the ever-growing number of SPAC IPOs and the funds raised through them, we can only expect to see the continuous thrive of SPACs at least during this period of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this article is meant to be or shall be construed as any legal advice on Hong Kong, US or the laws of any other jurisdictions referred to in this article or as any legal advice on SPACs to any person.

December 2020

Filed Under: 公司和商業法

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 51
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more

Footer

OLN logo

香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈
五樓503室

電話 +852 2868 0696 | 電郵我們
關於 律師團隊 辦事處 OLN IP Services 私隱政策
專業服務 最新消息 加入我們 OLN Online
關於 專業服務 律師團隊 最新消息 辦事處
加入我們 OLN IP Services OLN Online 私隱政策
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN logo

© 2025 Oldham, Li & Nie. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
聯絡我們

請在此處分享您的訊息的詳細資訊。我們將盡快與您聯繫。

    x