• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
location icon香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈五樓503室phone-icon +852 2868 0696 linkedintwitterfacebook
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN CS
close-btn
OLN CS
OLN was established in 1987 by Gordon Oldham with the goal of providing both quality legal advice and practical legal solutions to the business community.
Learn More
OLN CS Services
  • 繁
    • ENG
    • 简
    • FR
    • 日本語
    • IT
Oldham, Li & Nie
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
OLN CS
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • 新創公司
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • 新創公司
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 家族辦公室服務
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Send Email
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN Blue

OLN Law

  • Block Content Examples
  • Client Information & Registration
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Globalaw
  • OLN Podcasts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review
  • 加入我們
  • 專業服務
  • 律師團隊
  • 我們的歷史
    • 獎項與排名
    • 高李嚴律師行的企業社會責任
  • 所獲獎項
  • 標準服務條款
  • 聯繫我們
  • 評價
  • 評語
  • 辦事處
  • 關於我們
  • 高李嚴律師行
  • 高李嚴律師行和社區
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • 新創公司
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • 新創公司
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 家族辦公室服務
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

Form 5472 Reporting: What Hong Kong-Owned U.S. Businesses Need to Know

Featured Home

Form 5472 Reporting: What Hong Kong-Owned U.S. Businesses Need to Know

October 6, 2026 by serena

For Hong Kong families, investing in the United States can provide access to attractive For Hong Kong businesses with U.S. subsidiaries or other U.S. entities, Form 5472 reporting may extend well beyond the company’s direct Hong Kong owner. Related companies, family members, affiliated entities, and businesses under common control can potentially come into the analysis. Understanding these relationships is an important part of meeting U.S. reporting obligations and avoiding substantial penalties.

Hong Kong companies expanding into the United States often focus first on operational matters – establishing a U.S. entity, opening bank accounts, hiring employees, entering contracts, or acquiring assets.

But establishing a U.S. presence can also create important federal tax reporting obligations.

One of these is IRS Form 5472, an information return that can apply when a U.S. corporation is at least 25% foreign owned and has reportable transactions with foreign related parties during the tax year. Certain foreign-owned U.S. disregarded entities are also subject to Form 5472 reporting under special rules. The penalties for not filing are severe. Even though the form is relatively short, the penalty is $25,000 per year, per form, for each non filing violation.

For a U.S. company owned by a Hong Kong business or individual, determining who must be reported is not always as simple as identifying the shareholder listed on the company’s records.

U.S. tax rules can extend the analysis to a much broader network of related individuals and businesses.

Form 5472 and Hong Kong Business Groups

At first glance, the ownership structure might appear straightforward: the Hong Kong parent owns the U.S. company, so the parent is the foreign owner relevant to the Form 5472 analysis.

But the reporting analysis may not end there.

If the Hong Kong parent also owns businesses elsewhere in Asia or other jurisdictions, those affiliates may qualify as related parties. Depending on the ownership structure, transactions between the U.S. company and those entities can potentially trigger additional reporting.

This becomes particularly important for Hong Kong-headquartered groups with multiple subsidiaries, holding companies, or family-owned entities.

A separate Form 5472 is generally required for each reportable related party with which the reporting corporation had reportable transactions. As a result, identifying the complete related-party network is a fundamental part of the compliance process.

Who Can Be a Related Party?

One category involves a person or entity that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% of the U.S. company’s stock by vote or value. The analysis considers the relevant ownership interests rather than simply looking at the name appearing on a shareholder register.

Another category covers relationships defined under various provisions of U.S. tax law. Depending on the circumstances, these rules can capture relationships involving:

  • Family members
  • Corporations and their controlling shareholders
  • Companies belonging to the same controlled group
  • Partnerships under common ownership
  • Trusts, beneficiaries, grantors, and other trust relationships
  • Estates and their beneficiaries
  • Other entities connected through specified ownership relationships

For Hong Kong family-owned businesses, these rules can be especially important because business interests may be spread among family members, holding companies, trusts, and affiliated entities.

The analysis therefore needs to look beyond the U.S. company itself and consider its relationship with its 25% foreign shareholder and the broader ownership structure.

Why Sister Companies Can Create Reporting Issues

One of the easier relationships to overlook involves sister companies. Suppose a Hong Kong parent company owns a U.S. subsidiary as well as operating companies in Hong Kong, Mainland China, Singapore, or other markets.

Those Asian companies may have no direct ownership interest in the U.S. subsidiary. The U.S. company may not own them either.

Nevertheless, the companies may still be related for U.S. tax purposes because they are connected through their common parent.

This matters when transactions occur between the U.S. business and its overseas affiliates.

For example, the U.S. company might pay a Hong Kong affiliate for management services, purchase products from another group company, receive financing from its parent, or reimburse expenses incurred by an overseas affiliate.

Transactions of this nature should be reviewed as part of the Form 5472 analysis.

For a Hong Kong business group with several overseas entities, what initially appears to be a filing involving one foreign shareholder can therefore become a broader reporting exercise.

Formal Ownership Is Not Always the End of the Analysis

Another potential mistake is assuming that related-party status depends entirely on formal share ownership.

U.S. tax rules can look beyond legal form when determining whether common control exists. Depending on the applicable rule and circumstances, direct and indirect control, the economic relationship between businesses, and the way parties act in practice can become relevant.

This means a Hong Kong-owned U.S. business should not necessarily conclude that no related-party relationship exists simply because an overseas company does not appear on its ownership chart.

The substance of the relationship may need to be considered alongside the formal corporate structure.

Constructive Ownership Can Change the Result

Constructive ownership, sometimes called attribution, adds another layer to the analysis.

Under applicable U.S. tax rules, a person can sometimes be treated as owning shares that are legally held by certain family members or related entities.

As a result, someone who appears to own less than 25% of a U.S. company based solely on direct ownership could potentially meet the relevant threshold after the attribution rules are applied.

This issue deserves particular attention in family-owned Hong Kong businesses. For example, shares in a family enterprise may be divided among siblings or held through several family-controlled companies. Looking at each person’s direct percentage separately may not provide the complete answer under U.S. constructive ownership rules.

Ownership should therefore be analyzed under the applicable U.S. attribution provisions before concluding that a shareholder falls below the Form 5472 threshold.

Transactions Between the U.S. Company and Hong Kong Affiliates

Identifying the related parties is only part of the process. The business must also determine whether it had reportable transactions with those parties during the relevant tax year.

For a Hong Kong-owned U.S. company, transactions requiring review may include payments or transfers involving:

  • Sales and purchases of inventory or other property
  • Management or administrative services
  • Consulting and professional services
  • Royalties and licensing arrangements
  • Interest and financing
  • Loans or advances
  • Rent and leasing arrangements
  • Capital contributions
  • Distributions
  • Expense reimbursements
  • Other monetary and nonmonetary transactions

Intercompany activity that may seem routine from an operational perspective can still have U.S. reporting implications.

This is one reason Form 5472 compliance should be coordinated with the group’s accounting and transfer-pricing processes rather than addressed only when the U.S. tax return is being prepared.

Why Accurate Reporting Matters

Form 5472 carries significant penalties for noncompliance. A failure to file a required Form 5472, filing a substantially incomplete form, or failing to maintain required records can result in a substantial monetary penalty. Additional penalties may apply when a failure continues after notification by the IRS.

Where several related parties should have been reported, the exposure can increase because reporting requirements are evaluated separately.

For Hong Kong groups with numerous affiliates, this makes it particularly important to identify all potentially relevant entities before preparing the U.S. company’s annual filing.

Common Form 5472 Mistakes for Hong Kong-Owned Businesses

Several practical steps can reduce the risk of incomplete reporting:

  1. Look beyond the Hong Kong parent. Map the wider corporate group, including sister companies and other entities under common ownership or control.Review family ownership. For privately held and family-owned Hong Kong businesses, determine whether attribution rules alter the apparent ownership percentages.
  2. Consider existing trusts and holding companies. If shares are held through trusts, investment vehicles, or intermediate holding companies, the ownership analysis may require additional steps.
  3. Review intercompany transactions throughout the year. Payments between the U.S. entity and Hong Kong or other overseas affiliates should be identified and categorized rather than reconstructed at the last minute.
  4. Do not rely solely on the organization chart. Formal legal ownership is important, but it may not resolve every question concerning related-party status or control.
  5. Coordinate U.S. and Hong Kong finance teams. The information needed for Form 5472 may sit with accountants or finance personnel in Hong Kong rather than with the U.S. subsidiary.

A Practical Example

Consider a Hong Kong family that owns HK Holdings Ltd., which in turn owns a U.S. operating company.

HK Holdings also controls businesses in Hong Kong and Mainland China. During the year, the U.S. company purchases products from the Hong Kong affiliate, pays management fees to its parent, and receives an intercompany loan from another group entity.

It would be a mistake to review only the direct ownership of the U.S. company.

The broader group structure and each intercompany transaction need to be considered to determine which entities qualify as related parties and which transactions are reportable on Form 5472.

For larger Hong Kong groups, this exercise may need to extend across multiple levels of ownership and several jurisdictions.

Form 5472 FAQs for Hong Kong Businesses

1. Does a Hong Kong company with a U.S. subsidiary need to file Form 5472?

Potentially. Form 5472 generally applies to a 25% foreign-owned U.S. corporation that has reportable transactions with a foreign related party during the tax year. Special reporting rules can also apply to certain foreign-owned U.S. disregarded entities. The specific facts and entity classification should be reviewed.

2. Do transactions between a U.S. subsidiary and its Hong Kong parent need to be reported?

They may. Transactions between a U.S. reporting corporation and its foreign parent can fall within Form 5472’s reporting requirements. The nature and amount of the transactions should be reviewed under the applicable rules.

3. Can other companies owned by the Hong Kong parent be related parties?

Yes. Sister companies and other businesses within the same controlled group may qualify as related parties even when they do not directly own shares in the U.S. company.

4. Can family ownership affect Form 5472?

Yes. U.S. constructive ownership rules can attribute certain ownership interests between family members and through entities. This can affect whether a person is treated as meeting the relevant ownership threshold.

5. Does each foreign related party require a separate Form 5472?

Generally, a reporting corporation files a separate Form 5472 for each related party with which it had reportable transactions during the tax year. This makes identifying the complete related-party network particularly important for businesses belonging to larger international groups.

6. What are the penalites for not filing Form 5472?

Standard penalties are $25,000 per year, per form.

Review the Structure Before Filing

For Hong Kong businesses operating in the United States, Form 5472 compliance should not begin and end with the direct shareholder.

If you have questions about Form 5472 reporting for a Hong Kong-owned U.S. business, OLN’s US Tax Advisory Services team can help assess your ownership structure, related-party relationships, and U.S. reporting obligations. Contact us for guidance.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: 稅務諮詢部, US Tax Advisory Services Tagged With: Investment, Cross Border

Investing in the U.S.: What Hong Kong Families Should Know

October 6, 2026 by serena

For Hong Kong families, investing in the United States can provide access to attractive markets, diversification opportunities, and long-term wealth-building potential. But before capital is committed, it is important to consider how the investment will be owned and managed. The legal and tax structure chosen at the outset can significantly affect U.S. taxation, reporting obligations, liability, succession planning, and future flexibility.

For families and investors based in Hong Kong, a U.S. investment is rarely just a question of identifying the right asset. Whether the opportunity involves real estate, an operating business, private equity, or an investment portfolio, the way the investment is structured can be just as important as the investment itself.

This is particularly relevant for families whose assets, businesses, and family members may span Hong Kong, the United States, Mainland China, and other jurisdictions.

Decisions made before a transaction closes can have consequences for years – or even generations. A structure that appears straightforward today could create unexpected tax exposure, administrative requirements, or succession challenges later.

Start With the Ownership Strategy

There is no single structure that works for every investor entering the U.S. market. The appropriate approach depends on the investor’s circumstances, objectives, existing holdings, and connections to different jurisdictions.

Before selecting an entity or ownership arrangement, families should generally consider factors such as:

  • Hong Kong and other relevant tax residency considerations
  • The type and purpose of the U.S. investment
  • Long-term family and succession objectives
  • Potential exposure to U.S. estate tax
  • Existing trusts, companies, or family holding structures
  • Financing arrangements
  • The location and residency of family members and beneficiaries
  • Plans to sell, transfer, or pass the investment to future generations

These considerations are interconnected. A structure that is efficient for one family may be unnecessarily complicated – or potentially disadvantageous – for another.

Common Ways to Structure U.S. Investments

1. Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)

LLCs are frequently considered when international investors acquire U.S. assets or establish business operations. Depending on the circumstances, they can provide liability protection, management flexibility, and relatively straightforward ownership arrangements.

However, Hong Kong investors should not consider the U.S. treatment of an LLC in isolation. The way an entity is characterized and treated in other relevant jurisdictions may differ from its treatment under U.S. law.

This becomes particularly important for internationally mobile families or those with assets and family members in several countries. The analysis should therefore consider the broader cross-border implications before an LLC is established.

2. Corporations

A corporation may be appropriate for certain U.S. business investments, particularly where a company expects to grow, bring in additional investors, or establish substantial operations.

Corporate structures can offer practical advantages from an operational and governance perspective, but they may also introduce additional tax and compliance considerations.

Hong Kong investors should therefore evaluate the benefits of a corporate structure in the context of both the U.S. investment and their wider international arrangements.

3. Trusts

Trusts can play an important role for Hong Kong families concerned with preserving and transferring wealth across generations.

Depending on the family’s circumstances and applicable laws, trusts may support succession planning, asset protection, family governance, and estate planning objectives.

For Hong Kong families with beneficiaries, trustees, settlors, or assets located in different jurisdictions, however, trust planning can become particularly complex. U.S. rules governing trusts may interact with the family’s existing structures and the laws of other jurisdictions in ways that are not immediately apparent. This may be true even if the U.S. involvement is by beneficiaries that do not yet have transactions with the trust.

4. Partnerships and Joint Ventures

Partnership and joint venture arrangements can be useful when several family members, investors, or business partners want to participate in the same U.S. opportunity.

This may be particularly relevant to Hong Kong investors pursuing U.S. real estate, private business, or other investment opportunities alongside family members or investment partners.

These structures can offer considerable flexibility, but issues such as management authority, allocation of profits and losses, reporting responsibilities, transfer rights, and exit provisions should generally be addressed from the outset.

Don’t Underestimate U.S. Compliance Requirements

Completing the investment is only the beginning. Once an investor owns assets or conducts business in the United States, a range of U.S. reporting and compliance obligations may apply.

Depending on the structure and circumstances, these can include:

  • U.S. federal income tax returns
  • State-level tax filings
  • Information reporting requirements
  • Applicable ownership or disclosure requirements
  • Trust-related reporting
  • Entity filings and maintenance
  • Other cross-border reporting obligations

Missing an applicable filing can result in penalties, additional professional costs, and unnecessary administrative difficulties.

A common challenge for international families is that their advisors may be located in different jurisdictions. A Hong Kong accountant, U.S. attorney, wealth advisor, trustee, and other professionals may each be providing advice from a different perspective.

Each recommendation may make sense independently while creating unintended consequences when combined with the family’s wider international structure.

Coordinating Hong Kong and U.S. Planning

For Hong Kong families investing in the United States, coordination between advisors can be particularly important.

A typical transaction may involve U.S. attorneys and accountants alongside Hong Kong legal, tax, trust, banking, or wealth management professionals. Families with connections to additional jurisdictions may require an even broader advisory team.

For example, an ownership structure selected for a U.S. real estate investment could affect the family’s estate planning. Financing arrangements could influence how an investment is held or eventually transferred. An existing family trust or holding company could create considerations that would not arise for an individual investor.

When these issues are identified before a transaction is completed, families generally have more options for addressing them. Discovering them after closing can make restructuring considerably more difficult and expensive.

Why Planning Before the Investment Matters

Ideally, cross-border planning should begin before purchase agreements are finalized, entities are established, or investment funds are transferred from Hong Kong or elsewhere.

Early planning gives families an opportunity to consider the investment from several perspectives at once. It can help them:

  • Choose an appropriate ownership structure
  • Identify potential U.S. and cross-border tax consequences
  • Coordinate personal, family, and business objectives
  • Prepare for ongoing U.S. reporting and compliance
  • Understand relevant options considering the U.S. and Hong Kong do not have a Tax Treaty
  • Integrate the investment with existing family structures
  • Reduce unnecessary administrative complexity
  • Preserve flexibility for a future sale, transfer, or succession

The objective is not simply to complete a U.S. transaction efficiently. It is to establish a framework that continues to make sense as the investment -and the family’s circumstances – evolve.

Think Beyond the Initial U.S. Investment

For many Hong Kong families, an investment in the United States forms part of a much broader international wealth strategy.

A U.S. property acquisition may eventually become part of a family’s long-term investment portfolio. An initial business investment could lead to additional U.S. operations or acquisitions. A trust or holding structure established today may influence how wealth is managed and transferred to the next generation.

International mobility also matters. Children may study or live in the United States, family members may relocate, and business interests may expand into new jurisdictions. Changes of this kind can affect planning assumptions that were appropriate when an investment was first made.

Effective cross-border planning therefore looks beyond the immediate transaction.

Families should consider how a prospective U.S. investment fits with their existing assets, business interests, family arrangements, succession objectives, and overall global footprint.

Frequently Asked Questions for Hong Kong Investors

1. What is the best structure for a Hong Kong investor buying assets in the U.S.?

There is no universally preferable structure. The appropriate choice depends on factors including the nature of the investment, the investor’s tax residence, existing companies or trusts, financing requirements, succession objectives, and the jurisdictions with which the family has connections, and keeping in mind there is no Tax Treaty between the U.S. and Hong Kong.

2. Should a Hong Kong family use an LLC or a trust for a U.S. investment?

The two structures serve different purposes. An LLC may be useful for liability protection, management, and ownership flexibility, while a trust may have a greater role in succession, wealth preservation, and estate planning. Depending on the circumstances, more than one entity or structure may form part of the overall arrangement.

3. Do Hong Kong investors have U.S. tax and reporting obligations?

Potentially, yes. The requirements depend on the type of investment, ownership structure, activities conducted in the United States, and other circumstances. Obligations can include federal and state tax filings, information returns, trust reporting, entity filings, and other applicable disclosures. Additionally, without a proper structure, U.S. assets could be subject ot the estate tax.

4. Why should Hong Kong investors plan before transferring funds to the U.S.?

Decisions about ownership and structure can be considerably easier to implement before an investment is completed. Reviewing the U.S. tax, legal, succession, and compliance implications in advance can help avoid unnecessary restructuring and preserve greater flexibility later.

5. Why is cross-border coordination particularly important for Hong Kong families?

Hong Kong families may have assets, companies, trusts, beneficiaries, or family members across several jurisdictions. A decision that works well from a U.S. perspective may have different consequences elsewhere. Coordinating U.S. and Hong Kong advisors – and advisors in any other relevant jurisdictions – helps ensure that the investment is considered as part of the family’s overall wealth and succession strategy. OLN has a dedicated US Tax Advisory Services practice in Hong Kong. Contact us for guidance.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: US Tax Advisory Services, 稅務諮詢部 Tagged With: Investment, Cross Border

Hong Kong Succession Guide – What Happens to Hong Kong Assets When a Mainland Entrepreneur Passes Away

September 3, 2026 by OLN Marketing

When a mainland Chinese entrepreneur dies, leaving assets in the Hong Kong SAR, the assets do not automatically transfer to family members. The Hong Kong SAR has its own legal system and probate process, which must be followed before assets can be accessed or distributed to the deceased’s heirs. This article briefly explains the Hong Kong SAR legal process to distribute a deceased’s assets.

First step: Are there assets in Hong Kong?

The first step would be to determine which assets fall within the legal jurisdiction of the Hong Kong SAR. These assets may include bank accounts held with Hong Kong banking institutions, shares held in Hong Kong companies, real property (real estate) held in Hong Kong and/or securities traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The administration of the above types of assets would be dealt with through the Hong Kong court process and Hong Kong law will generally govern Hong Kong real estate, regardless of the deceased’s nationality or place of residence.

The legal authority to deal with the deceased’s Hong Kong assets is granted by the High Court of Hong Kong either in the form of a grant of probate (if the deceased left a valid will naming an executor who is willing to act) or a type of letters of administration, if the deceased left no will, the will is invalid or no executor is able to act.

Did the deceased leave a Will?

If the deceased left a Will, the Hong Kong court will need to decide whether the Will is valid under Hong Kong law and whether it covers Hong Kong assets. Hong Kong recognises Wills executed in accordance with the law of the place of execution or the deceased’s domicile. If the Will was executed in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), issues that sometimes arise include the differences in formal requirements between the two jurisdictions, lack of clarity over asset coverage and the absence of an appointed executor. If an executor is named in the Will, the executor (usually with the help of his/her Hong Kong solicitor) applies for probate in Hong Kong.

What if the deceased left no Will or an invalid Will?

If the deceased left no Will or an invalid Will, this is deemed an intestacy and the deceased’s estate will be distributed in accordance with Hong Kong’s intestacy rules pursuant to the Intestates’ Estates Ordinance Cap 73.

Who are the heirs in an intestacy?

Very broadly speaking, the surviving spouse (with a fixed statutory legacy in specific situations) and children take priority and extended family members such as parents and siblings inherit only if closer relatives do not exist.  A suitable family member (often the surviving spouse or an adult child) applies for Letters of Administration in order to administer the estate.

What are the documents generally required of PRC heirs?

PRC heirs are typically required to present the following documentation – death certificate issued by mainland Chinese authorities, resident identity cards of the deceased and heirs, hukou registration records to prove family relationships, marriage or divorce documents if applicable and notarial certificates confirming identity and kinship. In practice, Hong Kong courts usually require these documents to be notarised by a notary public in the PRC and properly authenticated (for example, via current apostille/legalisation arrangements).

What if probate proceedings have already been completed in the PRC?

Even if probate proceedings have already been completed in the PRC, it is not possible to apply for recognition of these probate documents in Hong Kong. Unfortunately the PRC is not listed as a country under Hong Kong’s statutory resealing regime as the listed countries are all common law regimes. A fresh application in Hong Kong is required.

Are there estate duties and estate taxes in Hong Kong?

Estate duties have been abolished in Hong Kong for deaths occurring after 11 February 2006 and there have never been estate or inheritance taxes. However, tax issues may arise in the PRC and other applicable jurisdictions.

What are some practical challenges faced by PRC heirs?

As a result of the numerous complications mentioned above, some common challenges faced by PRC heirs include delays due to incomplete documentation, difficulty proving family relationships where hukou registration records differ from actual family relationships, translation (from Chinese to English) as well as notarisation requirements and disputes over the validity or interpretation of Wills (the latter complication is not unique to PRC heirs but occurs across all jurisdictions).

It is important to note that if the deceased was domiciled in the PRC, PRC succession law may be relevant in deciding who inherits movable assets in Hong Kong, although the Hong Kong court issues the grant and supervises the administration.

What is the expected timeline?

A straightforward probate application in Hong Kong takes a few months to complete. Complex cross-border estates take longer, particularly where there is no will, documents must be obtained from mainland authorities and/or heirs are in dispute about their entitlements.

Does planning ahead help?

For PRC citizens with assets in Hong Kong, advance planning can significantly reduce complications in the probate process. Many have opted to execute separate Hong Kong wills to cover their Hong Kong assets to streamline the legal process in Hong Kong, appointed executors familiar with Hong Kong laws and maintained clear records of bank accounts, shareholdings, property and other assets.

Conclusion

The passing of a loved one is one of the most difficult times in a person’s life. With the benefit of advance legal planning, heirs will be able to navigate the complicated process of probate more smoothly and avoid unnecessary stress during a time of immense grief. And with a properly drafted will, one can generally choose who should inherit one’s assets, without regard to fixed intestacy rules in Hong Kong.

In conclusion, it is advisable to seek professional legal advice if one’s estate involves Hong Kong assets.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: Oln, 長者法律服務, 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證 Tagged With: Estate planning

香港生殖科技 —— 法律框架、倫理與新興司法趨勢

August 24, 2026 by OLN Marketing


(本文發表於《Hong Kong Lawyer》香港律師會會刊 2026年8月刊。)

引言

Louise Joy Brown於1978年7月25日在曼徹斯特出生,是全球首位經體外受精(「IVF」)技術孕育的嬰兒。八年後,香港首位IVF嬰兒於1986年12月在跑馬地一家私家醫院誕生。其出生在當時極具爭議,以至其父母拒絕透露其本人及家人的身份,以及其出生日期。據《南華早報》報道,天主教會曾譴責該程序為「以人工手段創造生命」。

時至今日,據估計全球每小時誕生57名IVF嬰兒。多年來的技術進步使IVF程序日趨普及,安全性更高,成功率亦大幅提升。

與此同時,香港的總和生育率數十年來持續低於2.1的替代水平,並於2025年跌至歷史新低。香港特別行政區政府近期為扭轉這一趨勢所採取的措施,包括:向2023年10月25日至2026年10月24日期間出生的嬰兒發放20,000港元一次性現金獎勵、提高子女免稅額、為公共房屋推出「初生嬰兒家庭優先配屋計劃」、增加幼兒照顧中心、增加公共醫療系統內的IVF治療配額,以及為輔助生殖服務相關醫療費用提供新的稅務扣除。

2025年12月,《人類生殖科技(發牌)(修訂)規例2025》(2025年第160號法律公告)撤銷了此前對自用配子及胚胎儲存10年的法定期限限制。此項重大改革與現代國際規範接軌,並推進了生殖自主權。

另一備受討論的改革範疇,是更新《人類生殖科技條例》(第561章)(「HRTO」)。HRTO於2000年制定,是規管香港人類生殖科技(「RT」)程序的主要法例。現行HRTO實際上將RT程序(卵子冷凍除外)的使用限定於「婚姻當事人」。由於同性婚姻在香港法律下尚未獲得承認,RT程序的使用事實上僅限於不育的已婚異性戀夫婦。商業代孕亦受HRTO明文禁止。

主要法例

HRTO序言列明,該條例旨在「規管生殖科技程序,以及為研究及其他目的使用胚胎及配子;在任何守則中沒有相反明文規定的情況下,將生殖科技程序的提供局限於不育夫婦;規管代孕安排;設立人類生殖科技管理局;以及就附帶或相關事宜作出規定」。

監管機構及發牌

根據HRTO第5條,人類生殖科技管理局(「管理局」)是依法設立的法定機構,負責履行HRTO下的多項法定職能,包括發牌及政策相關職責。

定義

HRTO將生殖科技程序定義為:

「……協助或以人工方式促成人類生育的醫療、外科、產科或其他程序(不論是否向公眾或部分公眾提供),包括 ——

(a) 體外受精;

(b) 人工授精;

(c) 取得配子;

(d) 在體外操縱胚胎或配子;

(e) 根據第(2)(a)(ii)款發出的公告中指明屬生殖科技程序的程序;及

(f) 藉符合本定義的程序已達到或擬達到的性別選擇,

但不包括根據第(2)(b)(ii)款發出的公告中指明不屬生殖科技程序的程序。」

HRTO並未定義不育。序言中泛指將生殖科技程序局限於不育夫婦。世界衛生組織將不育定義為「男性或女性生殖系統的疾病,指在12個月或以上的定期無保護性行為後仍未能成功懷孕」,此定義在實際操作中獲普遍採用。

執業守則及專業標準

根據HRTO第8條,管理局須頒布及維持《生殖科技及胚胎研究執業守則》(「守則」),為RT服務提供者及胚胎研究人員訂立詳細指引。守則於2007年8月1日正式生效。

守則序言指出,守則雖為保障服務使用者的健康及利益、以及保護經RT出生的兒童的福祉提供指引及最低標準,但相關專業人員仍應遵守其本身專業的執業守則及職業道德,守則並不凌駕於此。

資格要求

HRTO第15(5)條限制RT程序只可向婚姻當事人提供。結合HRTO序言及守則第4.2段(均明確提及不育夫婦),一般而言,在實踐中只有不育的已婚夫婦方可使用RT程序,但以下情況除外:根據第15(6)條,代孕母親不受此限;以及根據第15(3)條及HRTO附表2所列明的情況,獲准為醫療目的進行胚胎性別選擇的夫婦(例如為避免嚴重性聯遺傳疾病)亦不受此限。

由於HRTO序言及守則第四章均訂明RT程序只應向不育夫婦提供,因此除極有限的情況外,一般不允許基於社交或非醫療原因進行RT程序。

特定排除及例外

單身人士、未婚同居異性戀伴侶及同性伴侶,均無資格接受RT程序,因為HRTO一般按現行法律詮釋,將治療限定於婚姻當事人(守則第4.1段附注12)。

在此框架下,HRTO允許若干嚴格界定的例外情況,例如第15(7)條允許在夫婦於配子或胚胎首次植入女方體內時已屬已婚的情況下,即使其後婚姻已告終結,仍可繼續進行RT程序。另一例外情況是為避免嚴重性聯遺傳疾病而進行的胚胎性別選擇。HRTO附表2(及其修訂)列明獲准進行胚胎性別選擇的性聯遺傳疾病。

雖然在香港依法獲准使用RT程序的人士似乎獲得了充分的保護和支持,但不符合現行法律框架者(如單身人士、未婚異性戀伴侶、同性伴侶),無論其生育狀況如何,以及面對香港令人憂慮的出生率,實際上仍被排除在外。

HRTO及守則一般將RT程序的提供限定於不育的已婚異性戀夫婦。在現行法例下,同性伴侶及單身人士被排除於絕大多數RT程序之外。

胚胎、配子及代孕的商業交易(買賣)均受禁止。因此,只允許以利他方式捐贈胚胎、配子及進行代孕安排,但根據HRTO第16及第17條,可就合理開支予以補償。守則附錄二訂明向捐贈者補償的指引。

新興司法趨勢

在立法進展緩慢之際,案例法正處於法律、演進中的倫理觀念與現行公共政策的交匯點。在Re A及另一人 HKCFI 1749;5 HKLRD 366(HCMP 1571/2018,區慶祥法官,2019年10月14日)一案中,法院延長了《父母與子女條例》(第429章)第12(2)條所訂的6個月法定時限,並追溯性批准了商業代孕費用,儘管商業代孕安排在香港屬違法,原因在於:(1)申請人出於善意行事,並無道德瑕疵或欺騙意圖;(2)相關費用並非嚴重失衡至有違公共政策;及(3)親子令的頒發符合兒童的終身福祉及法律身份的最佳利益。區慶祥法官在A及B訴E HKCFI 3143(HCMP 731/2023,區慶祥法官,2023年12月4日)一案中,沿用並進一步闡述了同一分析框架。

上述兩案,連同CS訴SW HKCFI 2326(HCMP 1731/2023,區慶祥法官,2024年9月25日)及HSC訴T;HSC訴D HKCFI 770(HCMP 706-707/2025,區慶祥法官,2026年2月2日),共同構成一批新興案例,顯示香港法院傾向頒發親子令並批准出於善意支付的商業代孕費用,且始終以兒童的終身福祉為首要考量。在後一案中,法院再次就兩宗在深圳與兩名代孕母親達成的口頭代孕安排,分別頒發親子令並批准商業代孕費用,並延長了《父母與子女條例》(第429章)第12(2)條所訂6個月法定時限。法院就兩名兒童的終身最佳利益進行了考量。委託父母並非蓄意違法,而是因未能獲得適當法律意見而不知法律規定,實屬不幸。

代孕及法定親子關係

代孕安排屬HRTO的規管範疇。HRTO序言訂明其職責為「在任何守則中沒有相反明文規定的情況下,將生殖科技程序的提供局限於不育夫婦」。根據守則第12.2(b)段,只有在該婚姻中的妻子無法將妊娠進行至足月、且沒有其他可行治療方案的情況下,方可提供RT程序。根據守則第12.7段,必須由跨專業團隊向代孕安排的所有各方(包括代孕母親的丈夫,如有)提供輔導。

代孕只在利他情況下方屬許可,不得以商業為基礎進行。根據HRTO第17條,禁止以商業為基礎進行代孕安排。守則第12.1段亦交叉引用了上述禁止規定。

根據HRTO第18條及守則第12.6段,任何代孕安排均不具法律約束力。代孕安排的所有各方均應被告知代孕安排不具法律約束力。

守則第12.8段訂明評估委託夫婦及代孕母親的適合性標準,須考慮其身體、精神及社會健康狀況。代孕母親須年滿21歲(守則第12.4段)。

《父母與子女條例》(第429章)第9條訂明,誕下嬰兒的女性在法律上視為該兒童的母親(如她已婚且其丈夫已表示同意,則其丈夫在法律上視為該兒童的父親),不受任何代孕協議的影響。第12(2)條規定,委託夫婦須在子女出生後六個月內向法院申請親子令,法院可在第12(1)至(7)款所有條件均獲符合的情況下頒發親子令。

在HC訴WYH HKCFI 1157(HCMC 3/2023,朱法官,2024年4月30日)一案中,雙方已婚但其後分居。法院須裁定的問題是,欠缺親子令或領養令(涉案兩名兒童均由在加州達成的商業代孕安排所生)是否構成家事法庭就「家庭兒童」的最佳利益作出命令的障礙。

法院裁定,《婚姻法律程序與財產條例》(第192章)第2條所訂「家庭兒童」的法定定義廣泛且自主,由商業代孕安排所生的兒童(即使未有親子令或領養令)亦符合該定義,從而賦予法院在離婚程序中就撫養權及贍養費作出命令的司法管轄權。

在CS訴SW HKCFI 2326(HCMP 1731/2023,區慶祥法官,2024年9月25日)一案中,法院裁定,兒童的最佳利益及其與事實上的父母確立終身安全法律身份的需要,凌駕於嚴重違反柬埔寨、泰國及香港有關商業代孕的法律,以及超出《父母與子女條例》(第429章)第12(2)條所訂法定時限逾4年的情況。

制裁及執法

違反HRTO可構成刑事罪行,並可導致罰款、監禁及監管制裁,包括吊銷執業者及研究人員的專業執照。

結語

香港有關RT的法律框架制定至今已逾四分之一個世紀。2025年12月撤銷配子及胚胎儲存10年期限,是值得歡迎的現代化改革,惟RT資格要求及使用的基本框架維持不變。

更重大的發展來自司法層面而非立法層面 —— 上述四宗具里程碑意義的案件確立了以下原則:法院將在委託父母出於善意行事(往往是不知悉其法律處境的情況下)、費用金額並非失衡,以及已考慮兒童最佳利益的情況下,頒發親子令並批准商業代孕費用。

HRTO所禁止的與法院願意予以規範化的之間的差距正在擴大。在這種不穩定法律環境下出生的兒童,理應獲得超越法院所能給予的法律確定性。香港創歷史新低的出生率,應促使經濟及社會政策向跟隨司法發展的包容性立法改革傾斜。在此之前,被拒於香港RT程序門外的人士,將繼續尋求海外解決方案。 

免責聲明:本文僅供參考。本文中的任何內容均不得詮釋為香港法律建議或向任何人提供的任何與此相關的法律建議。對於任何人因本文所含的内容而造成的任何損失和/或損害,高李嚴律師行不承擔任何責任。

Filed Under: Oln, 長者法律服務

New Rules, New Risks: Navigating China’s 2027 Trademark Law

August 5, 2026 by OLN IP

On 26 June 2026, the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress passed a landmark revision of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China, which will come into force on 1 January 2027. This marks the first comprehensive overhaul since the law’s introduction in 1983, expanding the framework from 8 chapters and 73 articles to 9 chapters and 87 articles.

More significantly, the revision reflects a fundamental shift in legislative philosophy – from a system that primarily encouraged registration to one that emphasizes genuine use and market order. For brand owners operating in or entering China, the transition period leading up to 2027 is strategically important.

Key Legislative Shifts

The revised law introduces several structural changes that will directly impact trademark filing and enforcement strategies.

1. Stricter Controls on Malicious Filings

The new law explicitly prohibits trademark applications filed without intent to use and exceeding normal business needs. To enforce this, the authorities have introduced quantitative examination criteria in updated guidelines:

  • Applying for 50 or more trademarks within 12 months without a clear commercial rationale
  • Filing 10 or more trademarks across unrelated industries in a single batch
  • Targeting well-known names, internet trends, or generic industry terms

Applications meeting these thresholds may be rejected at the examination stage, and applicants risk being placed on regulatory watchlists. This signals a decisive move against trademark hoarding and bad-faith filings.

2. Increased Liability for Deceptive Use

The law now classifies misleading use of registered trademarks as a punishable offence. This includes branding strategies that rely on wordplay or presentation likely to confuse consumers.

Penalties may reach up to five times the illegal gains, capped at RMB 250,000. Failure to rectify violations within a prescribed period may result in revocation of the trademark registration.

3. Recognition of Digital Use

Trademark “use” is now expressly extended to online and digital environments. Acceptable evidence includes:

  • E-commerce listings and online storefronts
  • Social media accounts and promotional content
  • Livestreaming and digital marketing activities
  • NFTs and digital collectibles displaying the mark

This clarification significantly lowers evidentiary uncertainty for online businesses and aligns the law with modern commercial practices.

4. Expanded Protection for Unregistered Well-Known Marks

Foreign brand owners entering China may benefit from enhanced protection even prior to registration. The revised law allows recognition of well-known trademark status, which can be invoked to support invalidation or opposition actions against bad-faith filings across different classes.

Enhanced Regulatory Oversight

The revised law also strengthens enforcement mechanisms and imposes greater compliance obligations.

1. Proactive Revocation for Non-Use

Authorities are now empowered to initiate revocation actions against trademarks that have not been used for three consecutive years, without requiring a third-party challenge. This increases the risk of maintaining defensive or unused registrations.

2. Earlier Evidence Cut-Off

The evidentiary window for proving use has shifted to the three years preceding the alleged infringement, rather than the commencement of legal proceedings. This limits the effectiveness of last-minute or “token” use.

3. Shortened Opposition Period

The opposition period has been reduced from three months to two months, requiring more efficient trademark monitoring and faster decision-making by brand owners.

4. Increased Liability for Trademark Agencies

Trademark agencies that knowingly assist in bad-faith filings may face administrative penalties, including suspension or revocation of their business licences. This is likely to improve overall filing quality and professional accountability.

New Types of Protection and Procedural Changes

The revision also introduces protections for emerging forms of branding and tightens procedural strategies.

  • Dynamic trademarks, including animated logos and sequential marks, are now explicitly recognised
  • Limitations have been placed on delaying tactics in examination and litigation, reducing opportunities for procedural abuse
Practical Implications for Brand Owners

The 2027 Trademark Law signals a transition from a volume-driven filing strategy to one focused on substantiated commercial use. Businesses should:

  • Review existing portfolios to identify unused or vulnerable marks
  • Ensure consistent and well-documented use, particularly in digital channels
  • Reassess filing strategies to avoid excessive or unjustified applications
  • Strengthen monitoring systems to meet shorter opposition timelines

For example, a company that previously filed broad defensive applications across multiple unrelated classes may now face rejection or regulatory scrutiny. A more targeted, use-based filing strategy supported by evidence will be essential.

Conclusion

China’s revised Trademark Law represents a decisive move toward a more disciplined and use-oriented trademark system. The emphasis is no longer on securing as many registrations as possible, but on demonstrating genuine commercial use and maintaining orderly competition.

Brand owners who proactively adapt their strategies – by aligning registrations with actual business activities and strengthening evidence of use – will be better positioned to protect and enforce their rights in this evolving legal landscape.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: Oln, 知識產權法

Family Offices in Hong Kong: Tax Concessions, Re-domiciliation, and Proposed 2026 Reform

July 7, 2026 by OLN Marketing

Hong Kong stands out as a premier destination for family offices, offering a unique blend of business-friendly policies, robust legal frameworks, and strategic advantages.

1. Business-Friendly Tax Regime

Hong Kong imposes low and simple taxes with no VAT, capital gains, dividend, or inheritance taxes. As at June 2026, Hong Kong holds 58 comprehensive avoidance of double taxation agreements, with another 16 under negotiation.

2. Robust Legal System

The city operates under a Common Law framework, providing strong rule of law and investor protection.

3. World-Class Financial Services

As a leading global hub for private banking, asset management and professional advisory services, Hong Kong offers tailored solutions for HNWIs and families.

4. Skilled Talent Pool

Hong Kong is home to a highly skilled, multilingual workforce.

5. Government Support

The Hong Kong government actively supports family offices through initiatives like FamilyOfficeHK under InvestHK and tax concessions for single-family offices.

6. Strategic Location

Hong Kong serves as a gateway to Mainland China and the Asia-Pacific region.

Re-Domiciliation of Family Offices

As of May 2025, non-Hong Kong incorporated companies, including family offices, can re-domicile to Hong Kong under a new statutory regime. This allows family offices to relocate their operations while retaining their legal identity and continuity. The streamlined process involves an application to the Companies Registry, with approvals typically granted within two weeks.

Key highlights:

  • The family office retains all assets, rights, obligations, and legal standing post-transfer
  • The family office obtains the same rights as family offices incorporated in Hong Kong
  • A fixed application fee (HK$6,050 electronically / HK$6,725 in hard copy)
  • Upon approval, the family office becomes a Hong Kong-incorporated entity and must deregister in its original jurisdiction within 120 days

Regulatory and tax implications:

  • Tax continuity is preserved – profits tax applies only to income sourced in Hong Kong
  • Relief and credits are available to avoid double taxation during transition
  • No stamp duty is triggered by re-domiciliation

Tax Concessions for Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles (FIHVs)

Hong Kong’s Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles) Ordinance 2023 introduced a 0% profits tax concession for qualifying FIHVs.

Who qualifies:

  • ≥ 95% beneficial interest held, in aggregate, by one or more than one member of the family (charities ≤ 25%, outsiders ≤ 5%)
  • Normally managed and controlled in Hong Kong, outsourcing is permissible
  • Holds ≥ HK$240 million specified assets (shares, stocks, bonds, debentures, etc.)
  • Carries on all core income-generating activities in Hong Kong with ≥ 2 qualified full-time staff and ≥ HK$2 million local operating spend
  • Not a business undertaking

What’s covered:

  • Transaction in specified assets (qualifying transactions): trading securities, FX, private-company shares, derivatives, etc.
  • Transactions incidental to the carrying out of qualifying transactions (receipts capped at 5% of total receipts)

Practical steps to obtain tax certainty:

  1. Map ownership to confirm ≥ 95% family control (with any charity/unrelated shareholding within limits).
  2. Elect for the concession – once, in writing – before filing the first relevant tax return.
  3. Verify substance annually: head-count, spend, and asset NAV.
  4. Monitor transactions for the 5% incidental threshold and private-company anti-avoidance triggers.
  5. Maintain documentation (family tree, group chart, management agreements, NAV calculations) ready for audit or advance-ruling submission.

Legislative Update: 2026 Preferential Tax Regimes Bill

  • On 12 June 2026, Hong Kong gazetted the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Preferential Tax Regimes for Funds, Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles and Carried Interest) Bill 2026.
  • The Bill proposes to expand Hong Kong’s preferential tax regimes for:
    • funds;
    • Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles;
    • carried interest.
  • Expanded qualifying asset classes
    • The 0% profits tax concession would be expanded to cover additional asset classes, including:
      • digital assets;
      • gold and other precious metals;
      • specified commodities;
      • carbon credits;
      • private credit.
  • Broader eligible fund structures
    • Eligibility would be extended beyond traditional open-ended fund structures to include:
      • certain “fund-of-one” structures;
      • wholly-owned investment vehicles;
      • pension funds;
      • charity funds.
  • Carried interest tax relief
    • The Bill would enhance tax relief for performance-linked returns, including carried interest, for private equity and venture capital funds.
    • This is intended to strengthen Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a private capital and asset management hub.
  • Removal of 5% incidental threshold
    • The existing draft memo states that the concession covers transactions in specified assets and that receipts from incidental transactions are capped at 5% of total receipts.
    • The Bill proposes to remove this 5% incidental threshold, giving family offices greater flexibility in treasury, cash management and interest-earning activities.
  • Interaction with non-tax incentives
    • Hong Kong’s Capital Investment Entrant Scheme provides a residency pathway for individuals making a qualifying HK$30 million investment, including at least HK$3 million into a government-managed investment portfolio.
    • The scheme may also allow family members to be included, facilitating relocation alongside the family office structure.

Anti-Avoidance Measures

Hong Kong has implemented anti-avoidance measures to ensure that tax concessions are not abused. These measures include tests for immovable property, holding periods, and control and short-term asset tests.

Anti-Avoidance Measures

With its favourable tax regime, robust legal system, world-class financial services, skilled talent pool, and strong government support, Hong Kong is the ideal location for family office. Whether you are looking to establish a new family office or re-domicile an existing one, Hong Kong offers the perfect environment for long-term wealth planning and growth. Please contact us for further information.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: Oln, Family Office Sevices

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more

Footer

OLN logo

香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈
五樓503室

電話 +852 2868 0696 | 電郵我們
關於 律師團隊 辦事處 OLN IP Services 私隱政策
專業服務 最新消息 加入我們 OLN Online
關於 專業服務 律師團隊 最新消息 辦事處
加入我們 OLN IP Services OLN Online 私隱政策
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN logo

© 2026 Oldham, Li & Nie. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
聯絡我們

請在此處分享您的訊息的詳細資訊。我們將盡快與您聯繫。

    x