• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
location icon香港中环雪厂街二号圣佐治大厦五楼503室phone-icon +852 2868 0696 linkedintwitterfacebook
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 简
    • ENG
    • 繁
    • FR
    • 日本語
Oldham, Li & Nie
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 关于
        • 奖项与排名
        • 企业社会责任
  • 专业服务
        • 加拿大公证服务
        • 中国事务
        • 破产法
        • 人身伤害法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 中国委托公证服务
        • 争议解决
        • 公司和商业法
        • 家事法
        • 保险
        • 私人客户 – 遗产规划和遗嘱认证
        • 税务咨询部
        • 投资基金
        • 长者法律服务
        • 商业诈骗和资产追踪
        • 法国事务
        • 知识产权法
        • 日本事务
        • 合规、调查和执法
        • 公证服务
        • 金融服务监管部
        • 加拿大公证服务
        • 中国事务
        • 公司和商业法
        • 商业诈骗和资产追踪
        • 争议解决
        • 香港雇佣法和商业移民法律服务
        • 家事法
        • 法国事务
        • 投资基金
        • 破产法
        • 保险
        • 知识产权法
        • 公证服务
        • 人身伤害法
        • 私人客户 – 遗产规划和遗嘱认证
        • 金融服务监管部
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 税务咨询部
        • 日本事务
        • 长者法律服务
        • 合规、调查和执法
        • 中国委托公证服务
        • 香港雇佣法和商业移民法律服务
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 办事处

Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Send Email
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN Blue

OLN

  • Block Content Examples
  • Client Information & Registration
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Globalaw
  • OLN Podcasts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review
  • Test Blog
  • 专业服务
  • 关于我们
  • 办事处
  • 加入我们
  • 律師團隊
  • 我们的历史
    • 奖项与排名
    • 高李严律师行的企业社会责任
  • 所获奖项
  • 标准服务条款
  • 联系我们
  • 评价
  • 评语
  • 高李严律师事务所和社区
  • 高李严律师行
  • 关于
        • 奖项与排名
        • 企业社会责任
  • 专业服务
        • 加拿大公证服务
        • 中国事务
        • 破产法
        • 人身伤害法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 中国委托公证服务
        • 争议解决
        • 公司和商业法
        • 家事法
        • 保险
        • 私人客户 – 遗产规划和遗嘱认证
        • 税务咨询部
        • 投资基金
        • 长者法律服务
        • 商业诈骗和资产追踪
        • 法国事务
        • 知识产权法
        • 日本事务
        • 合规、调查和执法
        • 公证服务
        • 金融服务监管部
        • 加拿大公证服务
        • 中国事务
        • 公司和商业法
        • 商业诈骗和资产追踪
        • 争议解决
        • 香港雇佣法和商业移民法律服务
        • 家事法
        • 法国事务
        • 投资基金
        • 破产法
        • 保险
        • 知识产权法
        • 公证服务
        • 人身伤害法
        • 私人客户 – 遗产规划和遗嘱认证
        • 金融服务监管部
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 税务咨询部
        • 日本事务
        • 长者法律服务
        • 合规、调查和执法
        • 中国委托公证服务
        • 香港雇佣法和商业移民法律服务
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 办事处

Proposed Changes to the Profit Requirement for Main Board IPO

OLN Marketing

Proposed Changes to the Profit Requirement for Main Board IPO

May 17, 2021 by OLN Marketing

Introduction

2020 was a year of turmoil, with the outbreak of COVID-19 in late 2019 and early 2020, global economy experienced the biggest slowdown in recent decades. Despite the economic downturn and the poor market sentiment, the Hong Kong IPO market saw an increase in the total IPO funds raised in 2020 by more than 26% when compared with 2019 totalling HKD397 billion and if compared with 2018, total IPO funds raised rose by 38%, while the total number of new listings dropped by approximately 15% compared with 2019 and by approximately 29% compared with 2018. 

Consultation of the Stock Exchange

The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“Stock Exchange”) published a number of consultation papers in 2020, out of which the consultation on Corporate WVR Beneficiaries and Main Board Profit Requirement are likely to have bigger impact on the IPO market performance in 2021.

In January 2020, the Stock Exchange published the Consultation Paper on Corporate WVR Beneficiaries (“WVR Beneficiaries Consultation Paper”) proposing to extend the WVR regime to permit corporates to benefit from WVR, subject to appropriate safeguards. 

In November 2020, the Stock Exchange published the Consultation Paper on the Main Board Profit Requirement (“Profit Requirement Consultation Paper”) proposing to increase the profit requirement for Main Board listing applicants. 

The current requirement for a Main Board listing applicant is that the minimum profit attributable to shareholders shall be HKD50 million for the 3 years preceding the application, with HKD20 million for the most recent financial year and an aggregate of HKD30 million for the 2 preceding financial years. In the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper, the Stock Exchange proposed 2 options for the increase:

Option 1: raises the overall profit requirement by 150%, with a minimum profit attributable to shareholders of HKD50 million for the most recent financial year and HKD75 million for the preceding 2 financial years

Option 2: raises the overall profit requirement by 200%, with a minimum profit attributable to shareholders of HKD60 million for the most recent financial year and HKD90 million for the 2 preceding financial years

Reasons for the change

The main reason for this proposed change is that since the increase in the market capitalisation requirement from HKD200 million to HKD500 million in 2018, the implied historical P/E ratio based on the market capitalisation requirement jumped from 10 times to 25 times. The new profit requirement will bring the implied historical P/E ratio of companies only marginally meeting the profit and market capitalisation requirements down to 8-10 times, a level similar to that prior to the market capitalisation increase in 2018. The Stock Exchange has indicated that the proposed increase in profit requirement is aimed at:

  • Deterring creation of shells for subsequent disposal at a profit. 
  • Further distinguishing Main Board from GEM, attracting only sizeable companies that can meet high market standards to list on Main Board.
  • Improving the overall quality of Main board issuers.

Who would be affected most by this proposed increase in profit requirement? Obviously, companies that originally planned to list on GEM, pre-revenue biotech companies and those companies that can meet the new profit requirement will not be affected by this proposal. This proposed increase will surely drive some of the intended applicants who just marginally met the current profit requirement out of the game, unless they turn to list on GEM instead, or wait a few more years until their profits meet the new requirement. The new profit requirement does not only apply to potential Main Board listing applicants, but it also applies to listed issuers who intend to transfer their listing from GEM to the Main Board.

Effect of the new Profit Requirement

With the increase in the profit requirement for new listing applicants, the Stock Exchange expects the number of eligible companies to drop drastically. Based on the number of applications received by the Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2019, about 60% of the applicants would have become ineligible for listing upon adoption of either Option 1 or Option 2 of the new profit requirement.

Companies in early stage of development or small to medium-sized companies which have lower profits will be affected by the new profit requirement. But this does not mean they will be refused access to the capital market at all. These companies can still apply to list on GEM and raise funds for their future development. They still can transfer their listing to Main Board once they are able to meet the new Main Board profit requirement.

Transitional arrangement

The Stock Exchange acknowledges that there are companies who may have already commenced their listing project on the basis of the current profit requirement. As the new profit requirement is expected to come into effect not earlier than 1 July 2021, the Stock Exchange believes that there should be sufficient time for these potential applicants to prepare and submit their listing applications prior to the new profit requirement coming into effect. 

As indicated in the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper, applications submitted prior to the new profit requirement becoming effective will be assessed under the current profit requirement, provided that such applications have not lapsed for more than 3 months, been withdrawn, rejected or returned by the Stock Exchange. All applications submitted prior to the new profit requirement effective date will be allowed to be renewed ONCE after the new profit requirement effective date if the renewal is submitted within 3 calendar months after the original application is lapsed such that the application will continue to be assessed under the current profit requirement. But any further renewal of applications after the first renewal will be subject to assessment under the new profit requirement.

It should be noted that any applicant who has submitted their listing application prior to the new profit requirement coming into effect will not be permitted to withdraw their application and re-submit again just shortly before the new rules’ effective date such that the application will have a longer period of assessment and vetting under the current profit requirement.

Temporary relief

This may even apply to companies which might otherwise have fulfilled the new profit requirement but for the economic downturn in 2020 which caused its final year of profit attributable to shareholders to drop below the proposed new threshold. In the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper, Stock Exchange raised a point on whether temporary relief shall be granted to good quality companies with strong historical financial performance whose financial results were adversely affected by COVID-19 if certain conditions were met. If such temporary relief is adopted by the Stock Exchange, any potential company seeking such relief shall submit an application to the Stock Exchange for consideration on a case-by-case basis. As it is unclear whether this temporary relief will eventually be adopted after the consultation, it would seem unwise for companies to wait for the consultation conclusion rather than submitting their listing application prior to the effective date of the new profit requirement. If it turns out the temporary relief is not adopted, these companies may lose the chance of submitting their application before the new rule comes into effect, and will have to wait until they meet the new profit requirement.  

Conditions for granting temporary relief:

1. Aggregate profit during Track Record Period (TRP) meets the aggregate proposed profit requirement;
2. Positive cash flow from operating activities from ordinary course of business;
3. Circumstances affecting the financial performance is only temporary;
4. At least 6 months of TRP falls in 2020;
5. Sufficient disclosure on the likelihood of recurrence of circumstances affecting its financial performance plus mitigation measures undertaken plus profit forecast covering 1 full financial year after listing

GEM transfer of listing

Since the publication of the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper, sponsors have been actively pursuing potential cases trying to persuade and convince interested companies considering listing on the Main Board or a transfer to the Main Board from GEM to kick start the process in order to meet the last day for submission prior to the new rules becoming effective such that their applications will still be considered and assessed under the current profit requirement. 

Outlook for 2021

Since the proposed change in the profit requirement, if eventually adopted, will only come into effect not earlier than 1 July 2021 together with the proposed transitional arrangements which apply to applications filed before the effective date of the new rules, we can most certainly expect a surge in the number of new listing applications and transfer of listing applications to be submitted prior to the effective date of the new profit requirement. Applicants who have commenced their IPO or transfer of listing projects will definitely speed up their process with a view to submit the application before the new rule comes into effect. Even the Stock Exchange indicated in the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper that it is expected the number of applications will increase before the new rules come into effect. In fact, the Stock Exchange has accepted 102 Main Board listing applications since 1 January 2021 which is more than the combined applications for July to December 2020. Just in April 2021 the Stock Exchange has accepted 33 Main Board listing applications. It is very likely that the expected increase in number of both Main Board listing applications and GEM transfer applications will inevitably delay the process and vetting time of applications, whether these applications can proceed to listing within the original 6 months plus the additional 6 months of a renewed application under these circumstances in order to rely on the current profit requirement remain to be seen.

Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act

In addition to the proposed new profit requirement, the passing of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCAA) by the US government in December 2020 will also be a driving force for more US-listed Chinese companies to apply for secondary listing on the Stock Exchange pursuant to Chapter 19C of the Listing Rules. The Act requires auditors of US listed foreign companies to allow the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to inspect their audit work papers as a means to protect investors and further public interests in the preparation of informative, accurate and independent audit report. If a company fails to comply with this for 3 consecutive years, the Act requires that the SEC prohibit the securities of such company from being traded on a national securities exchange, including OTC trading.  will render the company liable to be delisted from the US stock exchange. 

With the HFCAA becoming law in the US, and the successful homecoming listings of US-listed Chinese companies in Hong Kong in 2020, we can expect the number of homecoming listings of US-listed Chinese companies to continue to grow in 2021. Amongst the top 10 largest IPOs in terms of funds raised in 2020, three of which are secondary listing of NASDAQ primary listed Chinese companies, ranking first, third and sixth. All three of these secondary listing companies are in the TMT sector, their total funds raised comprised 18.5% of the total IPO funds raised in 2020. TMT continues to be the hottest sector ranking first in terms of total funds raised in the Hong Kong IPO market in 2019 and 2020.

Consultation Conclusion on Corporate WVR Beneficiaries

The Consultation Conclusion on Corporate WVR Beneficiaries published in October 2020 further opened the gate for Greater China Issuers (having centre of gravity in Greater China) that are:

1.    controlled by one corporate WVR beneficiary (or a group of corporate beneficiaries acting in concert) which is the largest shareholder in terms of shareholders’ votes and such votes controlled by the WVR beneficiary is not less than 30% of the total shareholders’ votes (at or before 30 Oct 2020); and 
2.    primary listed on a Qualifying Exchange (being NYSE, NASDAQ and London Stock Exchange Main Market and belonging to the Premium Listing segment) on or before 30 October 2020,

to apply for secondary listing in Hong Kong.

These issuers, known as Qualifying Corporate WVR Issuers, will be treated in the same way as the Grandfathered Greater China Issuers under Chapter 19C of the Listing Rules. Qualifying Corporate WVR Issuers seeking to secondary list on the Stock Exchange shall be an innovative company and shall satisfy the qualifications for listing set out in Chapter 19C of the Listing Rules.

The total number of new listings in 2020 under the new listing regime, i.e. biotech companies, innovative companies with weighted voting rights structures and concessionary secondary listings, was 27, compared with 11 in 2019 and 7 in 2018, showing an increase by 145% and 286% respectively. 

Conclusion

The consultation period for the change in Main Board profit requirement ended on 1 February, the consultation conclusion is not yet available when this article is published. We will find out when the consultation conclusion is published which option the Stock Exchange will adopt.

In the 3 months since the Stock Exchange published the Profit Requirement Consultation Paper, the Stock Exchange has accepted a total of 44 new listing applications (including transfer of listing applications and Reverse Takeover) in November, December 2020 and January 2021. As rightly predicted by the Stock Exchange, the number of new listing applications (including transfer of listing applications and Reverse Takeover) accepted by the Stock Exchange in the three months between February and April 2021 almost doubled, totalling 85 applications. We shall see whether the number of applications accepted in the coming months prior to the new profit requirement coming into effect will continue to increase.

If you wish to learn more about listing in Hong Kong, please feel free to speak to our Simon Wong.

Simon Wong
+852 2186 1848 / +852 9460 9816
simon.wong@oln-law.com
Partner, Corporate & Commercial
Oldham, Li & Nie

May 2021

Filed Under: 公司和商业法

您为全球的税务改革作好准备吗?

May 6, 2021 by OLN Marketing

~讨论跨国公司应如何应对经合组织就自动信息交换及转让定价问题的新措施~

AEOI和CRS –对逃税的收紧控制措施

随着世界全球化,跨境经济活动近几十年来已成常态。从前,跨国公司(MNC)会采取较进取的税务策略,将其公司利润大部分藏于避税天堂内。由于这些避税天堂过往很少与外国税务机关分享资料,因此世界各国的税务部门往往难以搜集纳税人的离岸资产和交易资料及在其国家管辖范围内针对有关纳税人进行税收评估。为堵塞这些漏洞,经合组织开始率领国际实施自动信息交换(Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI))和采用通用报告标准(Common Reporting System (CRS))。

为确保参与国能在信息分享交换上互惠互利,参与国的金融机构必须定期向当地税务机关提供财务信息,然后将其转交至海外税务机关,以换取其他参与国司法管辖区所提供的相关信息。值得注意的是,截至2020年6月,已有100多个司法管辖区同意实施AEOI。

政策对我有什么影响?

假设您是国家A的税务居民,并且在国家B​​拥有离岸资产或收入。如果两个国家都承诺遵守AEOI,国家B将有义务向国家A的税务部门自动分享您的财务信息,以便该税务部门追縱您的跨国境外投资,并进行避税调查和执行违规行为。在新的披露制度下,涵盖的信息包括税务申报和财务报表、公司董事/股东、公司注册、权益、股息、账户余额、金融资产的销售收益等,令透过非披露(non-disclosure)作避税的方法极为困难,而纳税人居住地亦会针对其离岸而未申报的金融资产作出调查。

香港于2016年已就《税务条例》进行修订,以提高税收透明度和打击跨境逃税。香港政府与合作管辖区伙伴之间订立了双边协议后,双方便可进行有关信息交换。直至2020年初,香港须报告的管辖区已增加到126个,法律亦要求香港的金融机构收集个人/公司账户持有人的信息及其金融账户信息,以便与其他管辖区进行信息交换。此外,香港的金融机构必须要求帐户持有人填写自我证明表格(self-certification form)以宣告其税务居民身份,任何蓄意就居民身份作出虚假陈述的人士都有可能须负上刑事责任。

由于AEOI制度相对较新, 有关CRS制度下的潜在缺陷的新闻时有报导。例如,许多离岸司法管辖区仍未有公众公司查册制度,而最终受益人身份亦可能无法确定。但是,随着CRS制度日益完善,过去透过离岸公司用作保密的做法将被逐步淘汰。

重点

随着全球税务透明度提高,公司内部的法律专业人士应在实施任何跨境交易(尤其当某些离岸金融信息可能会被披露并向其本国机关报告)前,向他们的税务顾问征询意见。值得留意的是,它们可能不再基于保密或客户机密的原因而受到保护。此外,由于AEOI制度可能会在某些司法管辖区起追溯作用,因此,有外国业务的公司也应审查过往的交易,并确保已经充分披露有关税务资料,以避免因为将来面对调查而受罚。 

转让定价是如何运作?

如上所述,税务机关会经常密切注视跨国公司,确保其运作不会将其利润转移到海外公司。 “转让定价”是一种经常会受到挑战和审查的税务策略。跨国公司可透过“转让定价”人为地确定关联公司之间的定价,以降低整个集团的税务负担。当一间公司位于高税率管辖区而另一家关联海外公司处于低税率管辖区时,转让定价是一种常见的安排。试想像,当公司A是一间中国半导体制造商,而公司B是一家在香港成立促进全球销售的贸易公司,集团便有机会通过压低公司A的产品价格来操纵关联公司间的定价,令集团的制造利润的一部分在出售予第三方最终客户前从中国转移到香港,并享受香港更优惠的税率。以下图表解释这种情况。

世界各地的税务机关已积极采取措施透过反避税立法防止人为价格操纵以打击其征税收入。虽然各个司法管辖区的立法细节或有所不同,其共同目标均是以公平交易(arm’s length)为原则,要求定价按非关联方间进行的交易厘订。我们以下将简介香港有关转让定价的法律和实务的最新情况。

香港的转让定价(TP)

在2018年的立法修订前,《税务条例》第20条(现已废除)是一条过往长期被用作处理转让定价问题的法律。根据该条文,如果一个非香港居民与一个与它有密切联系的居民展开业务,而这些业务的安排导致该香港居民没有产生香港利润或低于一般交易的利润,该非香港居民的业务将会因被视为在香港展开业务而被香港当局征税。现时,香港的转让定价问题主要按第50AAF条连同其他反避税条款来处理。如果两个关联方之间的交易(i)有异于两个独立个体之间的交易和(ii)赋予潜在的香港税收利益,该条文则授权香港税务局按公平交易原则对收入或支出进行转让定价的调整。这原则与经合组织的《2017 OECD移转订价报告指导原则》(2017年7月发布)对应,并从2018年4月1日(即2018/19税务年度)起开始生效。值得注意的是,纳税人有责任证明交易是否以公平交易进行,如果他们不能满足香港税务局的要求,税务局可能会做出相应的转让定价调整。

三层架构的转让定价文件

总体档案和分部档案

纵使新法律已经出台,我们了解到香港的一些企业并未得悉他们可能须符合三层架构的转让定价文件要求。事实上,自2018年4月起,香港税务局会要求任何从事关联交易的香港实体准备一个总体档案(Master File)和一个分部档案(Local File)。它们必须在提交报税表时披露他们是否需要准备任何转让定价相关的文件。然而,如果某实体在一个指定的会计期间至少符合以下两个豁免标准,则可获豁免拟备有关文件。

• 跨国公司集团的总收入不超过4亿美元。
• 资产总价值不超过3亿美元;和/或
• 平均雇员人数不超过100人。

此外,如果相关的关联交易不超过以下金额,香港公司就不需要准备分部档案。

• 物业转让(无论是动产还是不动产,但不包括金融资产和无形资产) – 2.2亿港元。
• 金融资产的交易 – 1.1亿港元。
• 无形资产的转让 – 1.1亿港元;以及
• 其他交易 – 4400万港元。

香港税务局已经发表了《释义及执行指引》第58号,订下了总体档案和分部档案的详细内容。例如,总体档案必须包含公司集团的概况(包括全球业务的运营和转让定价政策),以便香港税务局评估任何重大的贸易风险。至于分部档案方面,公司必须记录企业在每个司法管辖区内的详细交易的转让定价信息,包括交易细节、涉及金额和与这些交易有关的转让定价可比性分析。

国别报告

若然跨国公司集团在上一个会计期间的综合集团收入至少为68亿港元,而该集团在两个或更多司法管辖区拥有组成实体或业务,那么该集团亦必须提交一份国别报告。该报告应包括全球收入分配、已缴税款以及跨国企业集团经营的税收管辖区之间的经济活动位置的某些指标。

转让定价可比性分析

该原则规定了五种转让定价方法,以便进行可比性研究时确定关联交易是否符合公平交易原则。确定合适的转让定价分析方法是一项非常技术性的工作,此分析已超出了本文的范围。然而,律师需要注意,税务顾问通常会根据纳税人所从事的行业或商业活动利用外部数据库进行财务数据的搜寻,并确立与同一国家内关联交易可相比较的数据,如没有相关数据的话,则会使用亚洲或世界其他地区类似市场以作比较。在许多情况下,四分位数范围等统计学概念会被用作确定关联交易是否符合公平交易原则。

惩罚

考虑到转让定价的不精确性,香港税务局已将惩罚上限订低于其他违反税例的水平,对不遵守该规则的处罚限于少缴税款的100%(而不是3倍)。如果纳税人已作出合理的努力来确定公平交易的金额,则不会被征收额外的税款。香港税务局亦认为,准备一份带有可比性分析的分部档案将被视为这方面的合理努力,而漏报或少报收入的处罚则较为严厉。

重点
对香港税务局而言,确定哪些公司有义务提交转让定价文件并不困难。很多时候,由于香港税务局并未向纳税人提出要求,企业并没有意识到新法规对他们的直接影响。因此,除非法定豁免范围适用,跨国公司可能会因不遵守有关规定而误堕法网。因此,我们建议他们在进行有关关联交易前尽早作出准备。鉴于上述涉及技术性问题,公司应征询会计和法律专家的意见以减低转让定价潜在的风险。

Filed Under: 税务咨询部

We Need to Talk About Your Website Terms of Use

May 5, 2021 by OLN Marketing

We know that you’re busy developing your MVP and growing your business but we need to talk about your website and specifically, your Terms of Use (sometimes referred to as Terms & Conditions or Terms of Service and abbreviated as “ToU” or “ToUs”).

We need to talk about them because the risks associated with operating a website with inadequate ToUs (or none at all) are huge. By “huge”, I mean that they could result in lawsuits or reputational loss that could bankrupt your business.

So, let’s briefly examine those risks and how to manage them. We can start by looking at the typical dangers of using your website as an extension of and/or marketing portal for your business.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Firstly, in Hong Kong, websites are not legally required to have any ToUs unless they are used for collecting or using data that could be used to identify users, in which case they are required to at least contain a suitable privacy policy that satisfies our privacy laws. Failure to comply will result in heavy fines. Furthermore, if the website is intended to be used by users in other countries, it may also need to comply with privacy laws there.

Even if your website isn’t legally required to have a privacy policy, ToUs are still worth having, to avoid or minimise the impact of things that can go wrong. Businesses use various kinds of contracts to deal with third parties for the same reason.

Here are just a few examples of the kind of things that can go wrong with various kinds of websites: 

  • Digital bulletin board-type businesses normally sell advertising space, allowing users to post content on the website, usually in exchange for payment. Without appropriate protections in their ToUs, such businesses will be liable for whatever content is posted even if that content is illicit. They may also become the target of complaints and lawsuits if service interruptions prevent the bulletin board from operating after advertisers have paid to advertise. 
  • A digital payment operator like AsiaPay or Ezypay will usually have full e-commerce capabilities, allowing users to access a source of funds and arrange delivery to a designated recipient. Most will request and store only the minimum information required to complete the transaction but nevertheless that information is potentially at risk of being used for improper/illegal purposes. A rival business owner might launch a DDOS attack to disable the website or a hacker could deface the website to diminish goodwill or make a political statement. 
  • Although school websites typically store a lot of information (i.e.: about the school, its academic programs, and its faculty, etc.), they seldom feature any e-commerce capabilities. Their intended use is primarily for users to access and take note of information but again, that information may be stolen or illegally altered without being detected. 
  • A bank’s website might conceivably feature all of the above operational features as well as provide connections to third party websites offering various non-bank services or goods. Criminals often use bank websites to gain access to customer records for the purpose of later committing fraud. 

Also keep in mind that any services available on your websites might be interrupted either due to failure of a designated internet content provider (ICP) or a server or other hosting medium. Alternatively, the software responsible for conducting business on your website could malfunction, resulting in transactions that are not recorded, products not being delivered, and refunds not processed. 

Without suitable exclusions of liability set out in ToUs, the worst possible outcome won’t just be loss of confidence in your brand; your business could be sued and held liable for any losses that customers suffer due to interruptions or failures. 

However, an appropriate set of ToUs can avoid or limit the impact of all of the above risks.

How ToUs Can Protect Your Business

The primary role that ToUs play is to regulate how the website can be used and by whom. They function like the terms and conditions of a conventional written contract because they are regarded as legally enforceable contracts that you stipulate.

All websites engaged in e-commerce should contain suitable terms of sale (i.e.: addressing pricing, refunds, shipping policies, risk of loss, etc.). They should also include limited representations and warranties tailored to the business, so that potential liabilities for certain foreseeable events such as interruption/suspension of service, late delivery and/or loss of data, will be excluded. 

Websites that are merely used to project an online presence for the business (but not involved with selling goods or services) still need ToUs but the scope of protections will usually be more limited because the risks associated with operating such websites are more limited.

In other words, ToUs are essentially risk management tools: by ensuring that all necessary protections are spelt out in the ToUs, you will set clear expectations for users and hopefully avoid most disputes. And, for any disputes which you cannot unavoid, the scope of liability will be reduced because users will be legally bound by your ToUs. 

Final Comments

Online businesses need to comply with all relevant laws as well as exercise appropriate oversight over the use of their websites to ensure that the business is fully protected and not prone to embarrassing lapses that might reduce public confidence in them. 

We know that you’re busy and you might not have budgeted for any legal expenses but now that we have highlighted some of the legal risks involved with operating your website, would it be prudent to take your website ‘live’ without a properly curated set of ToUs? Would you risk waiting to install a sprinkler system in your business until after it has been destroyed by fire?

In addition to helping to limit your legal risks, a set of properly drafted ToUs can also serve as an effective “blueprint” for your business, outlining the appropriate procedures that users need to follow in order to complete their purchase or other desired functions. It tells users that you are complying with the law and best practices. 

If your website currently doesn’t have proper ToUs or if your business has scaled significantly since the ToUs were first prepared, now would be a good time to have them reviewed by a lawyer.  

We have helped develop ToUs for clients in nearly every conceivable sector and won’t over-complicate the process. We can also give you sensible advice about whether or not to incorporate a privacy policy and/or a cookies policy.

May 2021

Filed Under: 公司和商业法

Green OLN团队接受了Adventure Clean Up挑战

April 28, 2021 by OLN Marketing

2021年4月24日星期六,OLN的律师接受了“海岸清洁历险大挑战”,并在星期六清理了香港美丽的小径和海岸线,一共收集了十大袋垃圾!

Green OLN团队负责人李汝浚律师(Ivan Lee)表示:“Green OLN团队是由10名热情奔放的律师组成的团队,他们决心在体能和精神上挑战自己,为香港美丽的小径和海岸线创造更好,更清洁的环境。我们不只会浪费纸张!”⁠⁠

正如主办单位Adventure Clean Up解释,“香港岛坐拥80公里左右的海岸线,但其中大部分皆是悬崖峭壁。尽管政府和社区团体恒常组织海岸清洁行动,让相对容易抵达的海滩得以维持干净的环境, 普罗大众却难以深入其他偏僻的海岸区进行护理,结果让这些地带成为了垃圾收集场所。’Adventure Clean Up的任务是提高公众对环境废物、海岸污染的认知,推广改善未来由个人做起的意识。并做到:

•    充满吸引力、乐趣和冒险
•    动员香港一众户外运动爱好者
•    借着实际行动和体验, 为参加者、社区、观众带来可持续的改变。

Adventure Clean Up的宗旨与OLN的文化和“实践解决方案,准时,无借口!”的承诺完美契合。我们热爱行动和户外活动,并在珍藏香港郁郁葱葱的绿色山脉中的远足径和海滩。

OLN非常感谢Adventure Clean Up这次有意义的机会,并向Green OLN团队表示祝贺!

2021年4月

Filed Under: 最新消息

联乘或是越界?

April 26, 2021 by OLN Marketing

作者: 蔡柏坚

联乘是一个特别的香港地道语,用来描述由两个知名品牌共同设计、制造和销售的”合作”商品,这些商品只在特定季节推出,并以限量生产,使得此类商品在市场上极为罕有、具标志性和抢手,例如Supreme x 路易威登(Louis Vuitton)(Monogram Box Logo) 经典花纹图案的连帽衫(发发奇(Farfetch) 市值为港币83,758元),或 Gucci x The North Face印花夹克( Stock X市值为港币47,900元)。 这些品牌的支持者非常愿意花费在这些限量版商品,并视作为收藏品,甚至为艺术作品收藏。

谈到艺术品,艺术家的作品大多是从由零开始的原创设计,而一些艺术家则善于运用某些知名品牌具标志性的产品来加以创作成为自己的作品(例如爱马仕·凯利(Hermes Kelly)或柏金(Birkin)包或一双普通的匡威(Converse)运动鞋),以艺术化的方式将此类商品的整体外观改头换面。在大多数情况下,品牌拥有人不会干预或反对, 反之此创作被视为向该品牌的地位和声誉作出肯定。在美国,按照法律依据,艺术家可在艺术作品中注入他自己想表达的意念并从自己创作得益。品牌拥有人通常会接受这类创作物品是普遍全球艺术文化出现的气象。如果艺术家越界并将有争议性的想法注入到重新制作的产品中,会发生什么的事情?

在2021年4月上旬,耐克(Nike)在美国向MSCHF Product Studio Inc.(以下简称“ MSCHF”)提出诉讼,原因是该公司推出了一款与饶舌歌手Lil Nas X合作设计的特别版Nike Air Max 97黑色运动鞋, 限量发售666对,售价为1,018美元,仅在一个小时内就被抢购一空。但耐克并不高兴,因为这双鞋以“撒旦主题”为概念,运动鞋的底层注入了红色墨水和一滴人血(据称这是来自6人设计师团队之其中1位成员)。这些运动鞋虽然加入原创概念,但未经耐克授权或认可。在互联网领域,有人呼吁抵制耐克,因涉及推崇撒旦主义!人们已经看到耐克迅速做出反应,通过基于商标淡化的理由提出法庭诉讼并寻求禁制令,损害赔偿以及货品的销毁。该案亦在很短的时间内庭外和解,然后才出现在法官面前。 MSCHF必须自愿回收Satan鞋子,并要回购MSCHF在2019年发布总共24双注入一滴从约旦河提取圣水的Nike Air Max 97白色的耶稣(Jesus) 运动鞋。

向所有受人尊敬的艺术家和设计师:我们很喜欢您们的创作及概念,但是当您们运用其他品牌的商品创作作品时,请不要越过界线!

2021年4月

Filed Under: 知识产权法

经地下钱庄到香港的资金会否被冻结及被裁定为属于他人?

April 22, 2021 by OLN Marketing

2021年6月16日

在2020年之前,透过地下钱庄系统转移资金到香港并没有受到 「质疑」。虽然涉及此类转帐的合约在中国法律下是非法的,但因香港法律没有管制地下钱庄,用这方法转移资金到香港不会出现太大的问题,尤其是如果交易没有涉及欺诈行为。

然而这一切都因香港高等法院近来的三个裁决而有所改变。没有参与欺诈或地下钱庄及没有怀疑款项来自这些途径的收款者是相当被动的。在现今香港法律下,这些人能否以「付出价值及没有被知悉的真诚购买人」(“bona fide purchaser for value without notice”) 作为抗辩理由?答案是,未有定论。

2017年10月12日之前的法律

直至2017年,香港高等法院原讼法庭在BR CAT International Co Ltd  v Hong Kong Proof Import and Export Trading Co Ltd(民事诉讼案件2014年第1023号,2017年9月22日)一案中认定,只要收款人对欺诈行为或地下钱庄的使用没有实际或法律构定的知悉 (actual or constructive notice),来自欺诈行为的款项并随后通过地下钱庄转移到香港银行户口的资金是属于收款人,并没有被冻结的问题。

此案的案情与大多数牵涉地下钱庄的案件相似:

•    一名外籍原告人(沙地阿拉伯公司)被一名网上骗徒游说,转账了美金140万到几个在香港的银行帐户(第一层收款者)。 
•    其中一个第一层收款者随后将该款项的一部分,即美金32万3千,再转移到第8被告在香港的银行帐户。
•    同时,第7被告需要将其位于深圳的银行帐户中的人民币兑换成美金再转到香港,于是便寻求第8被告的帮助。第8被告提议第7被告将该笔人民币转到第8被告在深圳和福建的帐户。
•    实际上,第8被告在中国收取了人民币,但没有兑换或转移人民币到香港,而是把来自原告人的美金转到第7被告在香港的帐户。

在裁定第7被告有权保留来自罪行所得的被兑换的资金时,法官指出尽管使用地下钱庄在内地是非法的,但这项交易在香港不是非法,除非收款者拥有法律构定或实际的知悉。所以第7被告可以保留款项。 

新的法律取态

案例1 – 高等法院在DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v Tian Wen Quan(民事诉讼案件2016年第3228号,2017年10月12日)一案中首次没有跟随BR CAT International法官的判案理由。在该案中,法官需决定应否解除冻结令/禁制令。诉讼因由是被告人获得并收到款项 (monies had and received)。法官解除了禁制令,因为他裁定在未真正审判之前,原告人的理据骤眼不充分。虽然如此,法官在判决中顺带一提,如果交易是为了避开内地的外汇管制,那么用作抗辩的理由,「付出价值及没有被知悉的真诚购买人」不能成立。 

案例2 – 在Grupo Arbulu S.L. v City Apex Holdings Ltd [2018] HKCFI 1351(2018年6月15日)一案中,讼诉因由是明知收取款项 (knowing receipt)。高等法院原讼法庭裁定,由于地下钱庄交易在内地法律下属违法行为,因此「付出价值及没有被知悉的真诚购买人」这个抗辩理由不能成立。法庭考虑到的一个关键事实是被告有积极参与地下钱庄,即被告亲自委托一间内地货币兑换代理商把位于香港户口并得自诈骗行为的的款项兑换成人民币,再将人民币转到一间飞机租赁公司的内地的帐户以支付租金。

案例3 – 高等法院原讼法庭在DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v Pan Jing [2020] 4 HKC 395 (2020年1月24日)中作出更进一步的裁决。他明确指出香港法院不会执行违反内地外汇管制的货币兑换合约,而且如果某财产在内地法律下被视为非法交易,被告就不能被视为付出了任何代价。 

如果被告只是一个被动的收款人,结果会是怎样?被动接受资金者的定位

上述案例衍生了一个问题:假设资金是透过违反内地法律的地下钱庄收到的,如果收款人只是扮演了一个被动的角色,亦没有证据显示他知道或者根据可疑的情况应该要知道资金的来源,那么他是否可以用「付出价值及没有被知悉的真诚购买人」作为抗辩理由?

高等法院在 Lesnina H. D.O.O. v Wave Shipping et al (民事诉讼案件2020年第154号) 一案中正是面临这个问题。案情如下: 原告人受骗将欧元1,879,726从它的克罗地亚银行帐户转到第1被告在香港的帐户。第一被告再将欧元1,875,461.68兑换成美金2,077,399.16,并将其中的美金32万转到第8被告在香港的帐户。差不多同时间,第8被告的帐户收到了一笔大约金额,是一间公司向第8被告购买保健产品的付款(第三方公司)。简单来说,第8被告正当经营业务,对诈骗案一无所知,亦与骗徒或第1被告毫无关系。而且,第三方公司付的钱很明显不是来自原告人。第8被告的其中一个理据是,对诈骗案的知悉必须在收到款项时评估,而不是在事后再评估。 我们仍等待法院的判决。

在目前的经济环境下,地下钱庄似乎成为了商业生活中的一个事实。如果你是诈骗案或地下钱庄的受害者,或希望避免在正常的业务过程中被剥夺应得的资金,欢迎随时联络我所的诉讼部门合伙人赵君宜律师。

赵君宜律师(香港律师,加拿大大律师)
+852 2186 1885
诉讼部门合伙人
高李严律师行

Filed Under: 争议解决

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 53
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more

Footer

OLN logo

香港中环雪厂街二号圣佐治大厦
五楼503室

电话 +852 2868 0696 | 电邮我们
关于 律师团队 办事处 OLN IP Services 私隐政策
专业服务 最新消息 加入我们 OLN Online
关于 专业服务 律师团队 最新消息 办事处
加入我们 OLN IP Services OLN Online 私隐政策
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN logo

© 2025 Oldham, Li & Nie. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
联系我们

请在此处分享您的消息的详细信息。我们会尽快与您联系。

    x