• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
location icon香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈五樓503室phone-icon +852 2868 0696 linkedintwitterfacebook
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 繁
    • ENG
    • 简
    • FR
    • 日本語
Oldham, Li & Nie
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Send Email
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN Blue

OLN

  • Block Content Examples
  • Client Information & Registration
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Globalaw
  • OLN Podcasts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review
  • Test Blog
  • 加入我們
  • 專業服務
  • 律師團隊
  • 我們的歷史
    • 獎項與排名
    • 高李嚴律師行的企業社會責任
  • 所獲獎項
  • 標準服務條款
  • 聯繫我們
  • 評價
  • 評語
  • 辦事處
  • 關於我們
  • 高李嚴律師行
  • 高李嚴律師行和社區
  • 關於
        • 獎項與排名
        • 企業社會責任
  • 專業服務
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 破產法
        • 爭議解決
        • 投資基金
        • 公證服務
        • 長者法律服務
        • 家事法
        • 保險
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 人身傷害法
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 知識產權法
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 日本事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 法國事務
        • 合規、調查和執法
        • 加拿大公證服務
        • 中國事務
        • 家事法
        • 知識產權法
        • 香港僱傭法和商業移民法律服務
        • 保險
        • 金融服務監管部
        • 破產法
        • 私人客戶 – 遺產規劃和遺囑認證
        • 爭議解決
        • 人身傷害法
        • 日本事務
        • 投資基金
        • 稅務諮詢部
        • 商業詐騙和資產追踪
        • 公證服務
        • 法國事務
        • 公司和商業法
        • Startups & Venture Capital
        • 長者法律服務
        • 中國委托公証服務
        • 合規、調查和執法
  • 律師團隊
  • 最新消息
  • 辦事處

6 unusual things passengers have sued airlines for

Test Blog

6 unusual things passengers have sued airlines for

February 5, 2020 by OLN Marketing

Nowadays, flying is part and parcel of business and leisure travel. We take it for granted.But unusual events can occur, and sometimes claims are made against the airline when injury and loss is suffered as a result.

Below are examples of some of the strangest things that have people claimed for. Happy reading.

1.    Nervous passengers. I handled a case defending a European airline that routinely played pop music to greet its passengers as they boarded the aircraft. Unbeknown to a passenger with a fear of flying, the airline in question (inadvertently) was playing ‘killing me softly’ by The Fugees as she made her way to her seat. Needless to say, this did not go down well with the passenger who brought proceedings against the airline, only to lose her case as the applicable air law convention does not compensate passengers for a mild psychiatric episode in the absence of any physical injury.


2.    Insect bites – in particular spiders and scorpions. These claims are increasingly common, particularly in the US. Allegations made against the airlines typically include a suggestion that the airline failed to maintain a safe environment for its passengers, owing them a duty of care. Being bitten by an insect amounts to a breach of that duty. Bed bugs are another source of controversy, especially where the airline is marketing a sleeper-type suite in a premium cabin. 


3.    Turbulence claims. An airline is strictly liable for proven passenger damages up to 128,821 SDR’s (so, roughly USD 177,000 in real money). This means that a passenger does not necessarily have to establish that the airline was at fault, and it is a little-known fact that an airline will often pay out for this type of event. Injuries sustained in serious turbulence incidents can include broken bones and head injuries, requiring hospital treatment on arrival.


4.    Visa irregularities. I handled a case involving a passenger who travelled on a 12-hour flight to Johannesburg, but was denied entry to South Africa and had to return home on the same aircraft she had arrived on. The check-in assistant at the departure airport failed to spot that the passenger did not have a spare blank page on her passport large enough to accommodate the South African entry visa. Needless to say, this did not go down well with the passenger who had purchased a return business class ticket!


5.    Being used by a hostile state as a human shield. I helped to defend a major European airline that was caught up in the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990. An allegation was made by a group of passengers that the airline had deliberately delayed the flight’s departure and flew into a war zone in order place a squadron of specialist troops into Kuwait. Ultimately the claim was defended on the basis that there was no ‘accident’ in the strict sense as defined by the applicable air law convention. Also, most of the passengers were complaining of psychiatric conditions only, and in most cases physical injuries were absent.


6.    Obese fellow passengers. Funny, but it’s true. There have been a number of claims brought against airlines by passengers who have suffered injury caused by the ‘encroachment’ or ‘spillover’ from those sat immediately next to them. Passengers affected in this way need to establish that being sat next to an obese fellow passenger amounted to an ‘unusual or unexpected’ event.

Contact

To discuss any issues raised by this article, or any other issues relating to an aviation commercial dispute then please contact Gordon Oldham (Senior Partner) at gdoldham@oln-law.com.

*Disclaimer – the views expressed in this article are those of the writer, and not necessarily those of the firm.

Filed Under: 爭議解決

Oldham Li & Nie achieves high rankings in Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2020

January 17, 2020 by OLN Marketing

We are delighted to announce Oldham, Li & Nie has again been highly ranked in the Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2020 directory.

OLN been recommended in the following 2 practice areas:

HONG KONG

  • Intellectual property
  • Labour and employment

2 lawyers are recommended in The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2020 editorial (listed below):

HONG KONG

  • Intellectual property: Vera Sung
  • Labour and employment: Jade Tang

Excellent comments are recieved from the researchers:

Intellectual property

Led by the experienced Vera Sung, Oldham, Li & Nie‘s ‘responsive‘ five-strong team provides ‘very appropriate advice‘ to local SMEs and larger international businesses across a range of contentious and non-contentious IP issues. The firm is particularly active in the publishing, retail and travel sectors and regularly acts for respondents and claimants in trade mark and passing-off actions.

Labour and employment

Headed by newly promoted partner Jade Tang, Oldham, Li & Nie‘s employment team maintains a significant offering across both contentious and non-contentious matters for employees and employers from a range of industry sectors, including financial services and banking. Leveraging her corporate and commercial background, Tang has particular expertise advising on non-contentious matters, including on the employment issues associated with corporate reorganisations.

The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2020 is now available to view online. You can view the results at http://www.legal500.com/firms/30993/offices/30842

Filed Under: 最新消息

高李嚴律師行當選為企業法務聯盟推薦的年度企業

January 15, 2020 by OLN Marketing

高李嚴律師行當選為2019年企業法務聯盟推薦的年度企業 (知識產權,香港)。該獎項旨在表彰我們為內部法律顧問和香港法律服務購買者提供的優質法律服務。

關於企業法務聯盟

企業法務聯盟是一個旨在幫助法務和合規專業人員在企業內履行其道德、法律和業務職責道德的團體。企業法務聯盟的成員為亞洲和中東地區的企業的法務以及提供合規和其他相關法律服務的機構。企業法務聯盟於1998年成立,目前約有21,000名成員。該聯盟每年舉辦16場企業法務大會,並主辦亞洲法律顧問雜誌和相關網站。

Filed Under: 最新消息

OLN Named “In-House Community: Firm of the Year 2019 – Hong Kong”

January 15, 2020 by OLN Marketing

We are pleased to announce that OLN has recently been named an In-House Community: Firm of the Year 2019 – Hong Kong in the area of Intellectual Property. This award recognizes our quality legal services to in-house counsel and buyers of legal services in Hong Kong.

About the In-House Community
In-House Community is a community of In-House Counsel helping In-House Legal and Compliance Professionals meet their ethical, legal and business commitments and responsibilities within their organisations. The In-House Community is comprised of individual member in-house lawyers and those with a responsibility for legal and compliance issues in the Asia-mena region. The In-House Community was founded back in 1998 and now has some 21,000 in-house members, for whom it provides 16 annual In-House Congress events, as well as Asian-mena Counsel magazine and online resources.

Filed Under: 最新消息

新一年,新冒險

January 4, 2020 by OLN Marketing

高李嚴律師行的知識產權服務 -2021年提供更多價值

2021年1月4日(香港)– 高李嚴律師行很高興地宣布成立OLN IP以拓展其知識產權服務。

OLN IP是一家諮詢公司,致力於為知識產權擁有者提供特定的商業主導的建議,從協助基於技術的IP,商標,版權,專利和外觀設計,到持續管理知識產權資產。 OLN IP由蔡柏堅律師(董事總經理)以及宋靜妍律師(均為知識產權領域的資深人士)領導,並得到了我們香港和上海辦事處經驗豐富的知識產權專家團隊的支持,共同為客戶提供適合其業務需求的細微而精確的知識產權建議。

高李嚴律師行將繼續提供有爭議的知識產權服務,通過行政和法院程序中的執法保護客戶的知識產權資產。我們還為在香港聯交所上市的公司提供法律意見。宋靜妍律師表示:「 OLN IP創建自高李嚴律師行的悠久歷史和聲譽,以及我們長期合作的客戶對我們的信任。我們對OLN IP作為獨立的知識產權諮詢和商業化諮詢公司,添加到高李嚴律師行商業解決方案平台中,感到興奮。」

「知識產權通常是公司最大價值的部分。考慮到當今客戶在多個管轄區和複雜的商業環境,公司須要在知識產權的各個方面都具有豐富知識的專業人士提供建議,才可以保護這些知識產權和創造價值」。蔡律師表示:「 OLN IP完全可以為客戶提供重要策略建議和實用的協助,以最大程度地提高其知識產權資產的價值。」

高李嚴律師行的高級合夥人高國峻律師評論說:「我們很高興蔡柏堅律師加入OLN IP。他擁有二十年的商業知識產權經驗,並將與高李嚴律師行合夥人宋靜妍律師一起領導新的企業。我們很榮幸能夠率先將OLN IP作為創新的諮詢公司來推動當今知識產權市場的變化。OLN IP與OLN Online,是高李嚴律師行為香港商業社區所需的知識產權和法律提供解決方案的又一例證。」

 —–

關於OLN IP董事總經理蔡柏堅律師

蔡柏堅律師在香港二十多年來,為國際品牌和機構客戶提供的商標管理方面以及有關中國大陸和海外的商標起訴,都具有豐富的經驗。
除了處理涉及商標和其他知識產權資產的商業交易外,他還參與了大量涉及高價值知識產權資產的併購項目的盡職調查活動。他還為一般知識產權執法,假冒/不正當競爭,域名爭議和數據隱私問題提供諮詢。蔡律師是香港商標從業者學會的前任主席,並積極參與該學會與知識產權局在知識產權法和政策審查與諮詢方面的合作。他還是香港貿易發展局舉辦的年度亞洲知識產權營商論壇的指導委員會成員。蔡律師活躍於在香港以外地區INTA(國際商標協會的亞洲委員會成員),APAA(亞洲專利代理人協會的香港設計委員會成員)以及Marques(知識產權新興問題委員會成員)。有關蔡律師更多信息,請按此處。

聯繫方式
Email: benjamin.choi@oln-ip.com / benjamin.choi@oln-law.com
Tel: (852) 2186 1871

關於OLN IP董事宋靜妍律師

宋靜妍律師是高李嚴律師行的合夥人,並領導高李嚴律師行在香港和中國大陸的知識產權團隊。她重點執業在商標,專利,版權,域名爭議,假冒行為,知識產權許可和知識產權執法。 宋律師在跨國公司的知識產權註冊,起訴,執行,資產組合管理和開發方面都擁有豐富的經驗。她的經驗涵蓋了廣泛的領域,從美國政府法律部門到企業客戶和慈善機構。 宋律師在2012-2013年被任命國際商標會議( INTA)的東亞和太平洋小組法律法規委員會主席。她於2002至2006年和2010年2015年擔任INTA的立法和法規委員會。她還曾於2007至2009年在INTA擔任地理標誌委員會。宋律師還是亞洲專利代理人協會(APAA)和香港商標從業者協會(HKITMP)的活躍成員。 宋律師也在2010年成為公證人。有關宋律師的更多信息,請按此處。

聯繫方式
Email: vera.sung@oln-ip.com / vera.sung@oln-law.com
Tel: (852) 2186 1871

 —–

關於高李嚴律師行
高李嚴律師行是一家獨立領先的香港律師事務所,自1987年成立以來,其對專業水準的承諾一直是該事務所的基石。高李嚴律師行的執業領域包括:
•    公司和商業
•    爭議解決
•    破產與重組
•    有爭議的知識產權
•    保險
•    私人客戶服務
•    離婚與家庭法

高李嚴律師行目前擁有45名律師,他們被一個或多個司法管轄區認許,包括香港,法國,英國,美國,澳大利亞和加拿大。 高李嚴律師行在中國擁有蓬勃發展的業務,在香港和上海設有辦事處,並在必要時與我們在中國大陸的合作法律網絡聯繫。

OLN IP Services Limited(OLN IP)地址:
香港灣仔海港道23號鷹君中心 3樓28室
電話:(852)2186 1871

 —–

媒體聯繫:
Liz Kenyon
市場與傳播顧問
高李嚴律師行
電話:+852 2868 0696
liz.kenyon@oln-law.com

Filed Under: 最新消息

New Patent System in Hong Kong

December 10, 2019 by OLN Marketing

The Patent (Amendment) Ordinance 2016 and the Patents (General) (Amendment) Rule 2019 will come into effect on 19 December 2019.  It marks the history of Hong Kong that she will have her originally granted patent registration for the first time.

Highlights of Reform of Patent system in Hong Kong

The existing patent system, namely, standard patent and short term patent, will be retained with some refinement of short term patent. 

The new feature of the reform patent system is the introduction of the original grant patent system and some other issues relating to the existing patent system. 

1. Standard patent by original grant (“Standard Patent (O)”)

It is an entire new patent system in Hong Kong.  The applicant can file their standard patent (O) application directly in Hong Kong without first filing the patent application in designated patent office. 

New features:

(1) Direct filing of the patent application with or without priority claim.

(2) Apart from checking minimum requirement on formality, the applicant will need to request for substantive examination within 3 years from the application date or priority date.

(3) The patent will be substantively examined as to its patentability, namely, novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability by examiner in Hong Kong. 

(4) If the examiner considers that the patent lacks of novelty and/or inventive step, he will issue examination notice (and/or further examination notice), and the applicant has to deal with the official objection.  The application will be granted if the applicant can overcome all the objection or it may be provisionally refused if the application does not fulfil the formal requirement.

(5) If the applicant cannot overcome the official objection after examination, provisional refusal will be issued, which is subject to review requested by the applicant. 

(6) Applicant may request for review on provisional refusal notice, and the examiner will issue review opinion (or one or more further review opinion), and the applicant has to overcome the objection.  If the objection can be overcome, patent will be granted. Otherwise, the examiner will issue final refusal notice, subject to appeal to High Court.

2. Standard patent by re-registration (“Standard Patent (R)”)

Standard Patent (R) application in Hong Kong is retained.  The procedure is the same as the existing system, i.e. the application must be based on a designated patent application filed in China, U.K. or Europe designating U.K.  It may simply regard this system as a re-registration system.  The substantive examination of the Standard Patent (R) is conducted by the designated patent office.

The application process is divided into two stages, i.e. 1st Stage – Request to Record must be filed in Hong Kong within 6 months after the date of publication of the designated patent and 2nd Stage – Request for Registration and Grant must be filed in Hong Kong within 6 months after the publication of the request to record in HK; OR, the date of grant of the designated patent, whichever is later.  No grace period is allowed for 1st Stage or 2nd Stage filing.

3. Short term patent (“STP”)

Under the current system, STP application can be filed directly in Hong Kong, subject to examination on the formalities and submission of a search report issued by competent patent registry, e.g. China National Intellectual Property Administration (“CNIPA”).  Proprietor to establish the validity of the patent in enforcement proceedings before the court.  The STP is retained with refinement as follows:

New features:

(1) The application can include 2 independent claims instead of 1 independent claim.

(2) Proprietor or interested party can request for post-grant substantive examination of the short term patent.  If the proprietor wishes to commence enforcement action of an unexamined patent, it is a pre-requisite to have certificate of substantive examination.

(3) If the proprietor cannot overcome the objection raised in the examination notice issued against the short term patent, the examiner will issue provisional revocation notice of the patent, subject to appeal to High Court.

(4) When making a threat of infringement proceedings against a person, the proprietor should furnish with that person the basic patent information.  Otherwise, the threat may be regarded as groundless and a party aggrieved by the threat may be entitled to seek relief.

Filing Tips under the New Patent System

Missing priority deadline –  Possible restoration of priority right if a subsequent standard patent (O) or short-term patent application is filed within 2 months after the expiry of the 12-month priority period   
– Statement of priority and supporting documents may be filed with the Registrar within 16 months from the earliest priority date claimed   
      
Reference to an earlier specified application – An alternative for filing something that appears to be a description of an invention (one of the minimum requirements for obtaining a filing date)   
– Applicant can file a reference to an earlier specified application together with a statement indicating that a description and the drawings (if any) of the invention are completely contained in the specified application   
      
Missing parts of descriptions or drawings – applicant can take its own initiative to file missing parts of description or drawing within 2 months from date of filing OR file the same within 2 months (extendable) from the date of notice   
– If filed within the prescribed period but later than the accorded date of filing, the accorded date of filing may be changed to the date on which the missing parts of the description or missing drawings were filed   
      
Voluntary amendment – may be filed any time before publication; OR   
– at the time of filing request for substantive examination   

4. Other Remarks

i. Regulating certain title or descriptions of Patent Practitioners

Under Patents (Amendment) Ordinance 2016, use of certain titles or descriptions is prohibited:

  • certified patent agent/attorney
  • registered patent agent/attorney
  • a title/description reasonably causing a belief that a person using such title/description holds a qualification that is –

(i) granted for approving that person to provide patent agency services in Hong Kong; and

(ii) recognized by law or endorsed by the Government.

  • Exception: titles/descriptions that solely relate to a person’s qualification for providing patent agency services in jurisdictions outside Hong Kong with clear indication of such jurisdictions is allowed.

ii. Revised official fee for patent filing

  • Concession official fee for e-filing over paper filing, applicable to Standard Patent (O) and STP
  • Inclusion of official fee for request for substantive examination Standard Patent (O) application/STP and request to review Registrar’s opinion on provisional refusal of Standard Patent (O) application or provisional revocation of STP
  • Revision of renewal fee of a standard patent on progressive scale, 1st level for 3rd to 10th year; 2nd level for 11th to 14 year and 3rd level for 15th to 19th year.

iii. New set of patent forms

  • New set of official forms for patent filing will be introduced, e.g. for filing Standard Patent (O), request for substantive examination.  Certain existing official forms are also revised to accommodate the new patent system.

iv. PCT patent

  • Though Hong Kong is not a PCT patent application receiving office, the applicant can claim priority within 12 months from their PCT patent application for the Hong Kong patent application.

Filed Under: 知識產權法

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 54
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more

Footer

OLN logo

香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈
五樓503室

電話 +852 2868 0696 | 電郵我們
關於 律師團隊 辦事處 OLN IP Services 私隱政策
專業服務 最新消息 加入我們 OLN Online
關於 專業服務 律師團隊 最新消息 辦事處
加入我們 OLN IP Services OLN Online 私隱政策
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN logo

© 2025 Oldham, Li & Nie. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
聯絡我們

請在此處分享您的訊息的詳細資訊。我們將盡快與您聯繫。

    x