我們很高興地宣布,高李嚴律師行再次獲得《亞洲法律》的高度推薦。
《亞洲法律概況2022》認可本行在以下業務領域的專業知識:
- 爭議解決
- 企業併購
- 知識產權
- 勞工及僱傭
- 私人客戶
- 重組與破產
- 保險

關於《亞洲法律》
《亞洲法律概況》專注於亞太地區商事法律服務領域的調研 。同時,為23個司法管轄地區(從孟加拉到越南)內的 28 個行業和領域,提供律師事務所的推薦和編輯分析。
《亞洲法律概況》於每年 9 月在線發佈。
《亞洲法律概況2022》是第 26 屆的年度刊物。
2021 年 9 月
Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong
我們很高興地宣布,高李嚴律師行再次獲得《亞洲法律》的高度推薦。
《亞洲法律概況2022》認可本行在以下業務領域的專業知識:
關於《亞洲法律》
《亞洲法律概況》專注於亞太地區商事法律服務領域的調研 。同時,為23個司法管轄地區(從孟加拉到越南)內的 28 個行業和領域,提供律師事務所的推薦和編輯分析。
《亞洲法律概況》於每年 9 月在線發佈。
《亞洲法律概況2022》是第 26 屆的年度刊物。
2021 年 9 月
The pandemic has turned our lives upside down. Not only because of the health consequences of the Coronavirus, but also because if you and your family are used to traveling, this last year and a half has been challenging.
Whether you are a Hongkonger owning a holiday home in Europe, or a European living and working in Hong Kong, this crisis has shown us that international travel as we know might become more complicated.
These uncertain times are the opportunity to reflect about our future, particularly when it comes to families owning assets in several countries, parents whose children live abroad, or expats who are considering returning to their home countries.
Estate planning is a real issue that should not be left for last minute. It is indeed possible to plan ahead to avoid difficulties arising upon death. There are several tools which will give you and your family a bit of certainty about the future.
OLN can help you secure your assets and plan your inheritance in advance.
European inheritance law might become complex when it comes to international families, especially regarding the following aspects:
Many foreign couples got married abroad or even in Hong Kong without drafting a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement.
Depending on the countries involved in your particular situation – nationality of the spouses and heirs, location of the assets – the applicable law to the matrimonial property regime could affect inheritance.
Foreigners living in Europe and Europeans living in Europe and abroad are able to choose the applicable law to their matrimonial property regime. Indeed, European Regulation No. 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes entered in force on 29th January 2019. Article 22 of this regulation allows couples to designate either the national law of one of the spouses, either the law of their habitual residence.
Once the applicable law designated, the spouses will be able to choose their matrimonial property regime. For example, a couple might choose separation of assets. However, under some European laws the spouses might be able to choose another property regime, more protective to the other spouse upon death.
This choice could have an impact on inheritance, since the surviving spouse might be entitled to a significant part of the assets acquired during marriage.
To determine your matrimonial property regime is therefore essential for estate planning.
In order to limit the difficulties raised above, the European Union adopted Regulation No 650/2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession.
From a European point of view, the applicable law to the succession will be the law of the last domicile of the deceased. However, the regulation allows citizens to choose their national law as the applicable law. A competent lawyer in both jurisdictions will be able to advise you about the best applicable law for your inheritance.
The regulation also creates a “European Certificate of Succession”, an essential document to be drafted by a local authority in order to transfer the ownership of the assets located in Europe to the heirs.
The local authority will need to ensure that the will respects European procedures.
Several tools are available for international estate planning besides drafting a will in Europe and Hong Kong. You could consider donating part of your assets to your children or incorporating a company who will own your real estate for your family.
An assessment of your particular situation is needed in order to determine the best options international law can offer.
I sadly need to remind you that the United Kingdom is not a part of the European Union since January 2021. But for every problem, a solution: our specialized lawyers at OLN can advise you on estate planning in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe and Hong Kong!
September 2021
Further to my previous article “Proposed Changes to the Profit Requirement for Main Board IPO” published in May 2021 (the “Article”), The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“Stock Exchange”) published the consultation results shortly after the publication of the Article.
To recap, the Stock Exchange published a consultation paper in November 2020 (“Consultation Paper”) proposing to increase the profit requirement for Main Board IPO listing applicants. The Stock Exchange proposed 2 options for the increase, one proposing to increase the overall profit requirement by 150% of the current profit requirement (“Option 1”) and the other proposing to increase the overall profit requirement by 200% (“Option 2”).
Noting that some companies with a proposed small market capitalization at the time of application that might not be able to meet their profit forecast post-listing and the concerns raised by respondents to the Consultation Paper on the proposed increase in Main Board profit requirements, the Stock Exchange adopted a profit increase which is neither Option 1 nor Option 2. The new profit requirement adopted by the Stock Exchange is a modified version of Option 1 and Option 2 (“Modified Profit Requirement”), being HKD35 million for the most recent financial year prior to the listing application and HKD45 million in aggregate for the 2 preceding financial years, representing a 60% increase from the current profit requirement and a change in the profit spread from 60%:40% to 56%:44%. With the Modified Profit Requirement, the implied historical P/E ratio drops from 25 times to 14 times. The Stock Exchange is also prepared to grant relief from the profit spread under the Modified Profit Requirement in order to allow more flexibilities to listing applicants, on a case-by-case basis. The Modified Profit Requirement takes effect on 1 January 2022.
Although the Modified Profit Requirement is less than Option 1 and Option 2, still with such increase, it will inevitably drive away small size companies who are only marginally able to meet the current Main Board profit requirement. On the other hand, with the Modified Profit Requirement, small market capitalization companies which might otherwise not be eligible for listing on the Main Board under the proposed increase under Option 1/Option 2 can still apply for Main Board listing if they satisfy the new requirement.
In fact, as previously mentioned, the Stock Exchange accepted 102 Main Board IPO listing applications between January and April 2021 since the publication of the Consultation Paper, the number of new Main Board listing applications received by the Stock Exchange between May and August 2021 was 135[2], indicating that even more companies are aiming to take advantage of the last chance to be assessed based on the current profit requirement.
The impact of the Modified Profit Requirement remains to be seen but at least it has the effect of pushing forward the IPO plans of companies with low profits who may not qualify to be listed on the Main Board after the new profit requirement rules come into effect. We can expect to see even more new Main Board IPO applications to be submitted to the Stock Exchange prior to the Modified Profit Requirement coming into effect.
If you wish to learn more about listing in Hong Kong, please feel free to speak to our Simon Wong.
Simon Wong
+852 2186 1848 / +852 9460 9816
simon.wong@oln-law.com
Partner, Corporate & Commercial
Oldham, Li & Nie
September 2021
[1] Consultation Conclusions – The Main Board Profit Requirement
[2] Progress Report for New Listing Applications – Main Board IPO Applications
2021年九月
在「仲裁庭判令附帶法庭程序費用的權力」(《香港律師》,2021年6月)一文中,作者認為,由於在附帶法庭訴訟中申請臨時措施所招致的費用(「附帶法庭程序的費用」)不能構成「仲裁程序的費用」,仲裁庭因此不能判給申請方相關費用。
被忽視的法例
我等謹認為,《再談在仲裁中追討附帶法庭程序的費用》(《香港律師》,2021年4月)闡述的分析尚未被充分理解,而《仲裁條例》第74(3)條亦再次被忽略。
簡而言之,《仲裁條例》第74(3)條明確規定,「凡任何一方要求作出命令或指示(包括臨時措施),則仲裁庭亦可就該請求……命令一方支付費用」。(作者後加的强調)該條文看來已授權仲裁庭就《仲裁條例》第74(1)條衍生的一般仲裁程序費用以外的費用頒令。
仲裁程序的費用
儘管許多有關其他司法管轄區的文章都曾探討「仲裁程序的費用」這概念,但這些討論與《仲裁條例》第74(3)條的詮釋並不相關。《仲裁條例》第74(3)條乃是一條由香港立法會議員創造的獨特條文,外國法規並無任何同等的條文。
無論如何,前文作者所引用的文獻亦指出了某些仲裁庭可以在仲裁中判給「附帶法庭程序的費用」的情況。
1.《國際仲裁實務指引》(International Arbitration Practice Guideline)(2006年)中提及,若本地法院無法處理臨時措施的費用,或法院已將其提交予仲裁庭決定,則臨時措施的費用可能在仲裁中予以追討。
2. 同樣地,Micha Bühler(2018年)接受了只要沒有重複判給費用且相關法律程序沒有違反仲裁協議,「附帶法庭程序的費用」也許可以作為仲裁費用予以追討。
3. Jeffrey Waincymer教授(2012年)進一步指出,「如果這是勝方用以支持仲裁的附帶行為,例如於法院取得臨時措施的費用」,該「附帶法庭程序的費用」則有可能被視為仲裁費用。
原則上,除非另有明確規定,否則仲裁庭判給「附帶法庭程序的費用」的管轄權不應取決於某些事件而定。因此,依我們愚見,這些文獻均傾向支持而不是否定仲裁庭確實對判給「附帶法庭程序的費用」擁有管轄權的觀點。較好的說法應是仲裁庭雖有判給訟費的管轄權,但基於顯而易見及不必重複的公共政策原因,這種管轄權只應在極罕見的情況下使用。
務實及可行的商業解決方案
雖然要求外國司法管轄區特別容許仲裁庭判給「附帶法庭程序的費用」這主張可能值得推崇,但若這主張與外國司法管轄區預設的訟費原則相反,則並不現實。無論如何,要改變每個外國司法管轄區的常規亦是不切實際的。
依我們愚見,一個簡單而可行的解決方案,亦與上述Waincymer(2012年)的學術文獻相符,是在仲裁協議中加入訟費彌償條款,訂明「附帶法庭程序的費用」可作為損害賠償予以追討。
鳴謝
作者感謝梁泳澤律師(高李嚴律師行合夥人)的研究指導和梁冠衡先生(高李嚴律師行暑期實習生)的研究投入。任何錯誤、遺漏和失誤都是作者自己的責任。
1. 澳洲與香港的税制的分別
香港
澳洲
2. 澳洲税制的簡介
A. 全球徵稅制度 – 澳洲稅務居民(Tax Resident) vs非稅務居民 (Foreign Resident)
澳洲居民
年收入稅階(澳元) |
稅率 |
$0 – $18,200 |
0 |
$18,201 – $37,000 |
19% |
$37,001 – $90,000 |
32.5% |
$90,001 – $180,000 |
37% |
$180,001 或以上 |
45% |
非稅務居民 (Foreign Resident)
年收入稅階(澳元) |
稅率 |
$0 – $90,000 |
32.5% |
$90,001 – $180,000 |
37% |
$180,001 或以上 |
45% |
B. 香港與澳洲沒有簽定雙邊稅務條約 (Double Taxation Agreement)
3. 移民前的稅務計畫
A. 對投資資產進行評估
B. 妥善運用澳洲負扣稅 (Negative Gearing)
C. 設立信託
聯絡我們:
Anna Chan 陳韻祺律師
Partner 合伙人
anna.chan@oln-law.com
免責聲明:本文僅供參考。本文中的任何內容均不得解釋為對任何人提供的澳洲或香港法律意見或任何與此有關的法律意見。高李嚴律師事務所對任何人因本文所所載的任何內容而行所造成的任何損失和/或損害不承擔任何責任。
A. 比較香港與加拿大的稅率
|
個人所得稅 |
公司利得税 |
股息稅 |
資本利得稅 |
土地/物業稅 |
遺產稅 |
香港 |
2% – 17% (標準稅率: 15%) |
16.5% |
N/A |
N/A |
應評稅租金淨收入的15% |
在2005年7月15日或之後不徵收遺產稅 |
加拿大 |
聯邦 + 省 British Columbia (BC): 15% – 49.8% Ontario: 15% – 53.53% |
聯邦: 15% BC: 12% Ontario: 11.5%/10% |
本土股息收入: 28%-48% 海外股息收入: 100% |
50%的全球資本收益會被視為個人所得徵稅 |
基於財產的租值並根據市政當局的稅率徵稅 |
沒有遺產稅,但是個人會被視為在臨死前出售所有資產(deemed disposition),因「出售」而所得之資產利潤都須繳納資本利得稅 |
B. 稅務居民 (Tax Resident)
C. 註冊退休儲蓄計劃 (RRSP)
D. 「成本提升」法 (Step-up in the cost base)
E. 香港與加拿大的避免雙重徵稅協定(Double Taxation Agreement (“DTA”))
F. 稅務籌劃 (Tax Planning)
聯絡我們:
Anna Chan 陳韻祺律師
合伙人
anna.chan@oln-law.com
聯絡我們:
Stephen Holmes
註冊海外律師(英屬哥倫比亞,加拿大)
stephen.holmes@oln-law.com
免責聲明:本文僅供參考。本文中的任何內容均不應被解釋為對香港的法律建議或對任何人的任何法律建議。對於因本材料而對任何人導致的任何損失和/或損害,高李嚴律師行概不負責。
This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more
香港中環雪厰街二號聖佐治大廈
五樓503室
請在此處分享您的訊息的詳細資訊。我們將盡快與您聯繫。