• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
location iconSuite 503, 5/F, St. George's Building, 2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kongphone-icon +852 2868 0696 linkedintwitterfacebook
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • FR
    • ENG
    • 简
    • 繁
    • 日本語
Oldham, Li & Nie
OLN IP Services
close-btn
OLN IP Services
Get bespoke and commercially-driven advice to your Intellectual Property
Learn More
OLN IP Services
OLN Online
close-btn
OLN Online
Powered by Oldham, Li & Nie, the law firm of choice for Hong Kong’s vibrant startup and SME community, OLN Online is a forward-looking and seamless addition to traditional legal services – a true disruptor.
Learn More
OLN IP Services
  • À propos
        • Distinctions et classements
        • Responsabilité sociale des entreprises
  • Domaines de pratique
        • Canadian Notarization Services
        • China Practice
        • Droit du Travail et de l’Immigration Appliqué aux Entreprises
        • Droit des Procédures Collectives et des Restructurations
        • Droit des Dommages Corporels
        • Conseil Fiscal
        • Résolution des Litiges
        • Droit des Ainés
        • Droit des Sociétés et Droit Commercial
        • Droit de la Famille
        • Droit des Assurances
        • Clientèle Privée
        • Pratique Japonaise
        • Fonds Offshore
        • Regulatory Compliance, Investigations and Enforcement
        • Fraude Commerciale et Recherche d'Avoirs
        • Pratique Française
        • Droit de la Propriété Intellectuelle
        • Services Financiers et Règlementations
        • Services Notariaux
        • Startups
        • Chinese Notary Services (CAAO)
        • Canadian Notarization Services
        • China Practice
        • Droit des Sociétés et Droit Commercial
        • Fraude Commerciale et Recherche d’Avoirs
        • Droit du Travail et de l’Immigration Appliqué aux Entreprises
        • Droit de la Famille
        • Pratique Française
        • Droit des Procédures Collectives et des Restructurations
        • Droit des Assurances
        • Droit de la Propriété Intellectuelle
        • Droit des Dommages Corporels
        • Clientèle Privée
        • Services Financiers et Règlementations
        • Conseil Fiscal
        • Pratique Japonaise
        • Services Notariaux
        • Résolution des Litiges
        • Fonds Offshore
        • Startups
        • Droit des Ainés
        • Regulatory Compliance, Investigations and Enforcement
        • Chinese Notary Services (CAAO)
  • Notre equipe
  • Actualités
  • Nos bureaux

Suite 503, St. George's Building,
2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Send Email
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN Blue

OLN

  • À propos d’ OLN
    • CSR
    • Distinctions & Classements
  • Awards and Ranking
  • Block Content Examples
  • Carrières
  • Ce que les autres disent
  • Client Information & Registration
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Globalaw
  • La responsabilité sociale des entreprises au sein d’OLN
  • Le cabinet
  • Nos services
  • Notre equipe
  • Oldham, Li & Nie
  • OLN Podcasts
  • Our Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review
  • Reviews
  • Standard Terms of Engagement
  • Test Blog
  • À propos
        • Distinctions et classements
        • Responsabilité sociale des entreprises
  • Domaines de pratique
        • Canadian Notarization Services
        • China Practice
        • Droit du Travail et de l’Immigration Appliqué aux Entreprises
        • Droit des Procédures Collectives et des Restructurations
        • Droit des Dommages Corporels
        • Conseil Fiscal
        • Résolution des Litiges
        • Droit des Ainés
        • Droit des Sociétés et Droit Commercial
        • Droit de la Famille
        • Droit des Assurances
        • Clientèle Privée
        • Pratique Japonaise
        • Fonds Offshore
        • Regulatory Compliance, Investigations and Enforcement
        • Fraude Commerciale et Recherche d'Avoirs
        • Pratique Française
        • Droit de la Propriété Intellectuelle
        • Services Financiers et Règlementations
        • Services Notariaux
        • Startups
        • Chinese Notary Services (CAAO)
        • Canadian Notarization Services
        • China Practice
        • Droit des Sociétés et Droit Commercial
        • Fraude Commerciale et Recherche d’Avoirs
        • Droit du Travail et de l’Immigration Appliqué aux Entreprises
        • Droit de la Famille
        • Pratique Française
        • Droit des Procédures Collectives et des Restructurations
        • Droit des Assurances
        • Droit de la Propriété Intellectuelle
        • Droit des Dommages Corporels
        • Clientèle Privée
        • Services Financiers et Règlementations
        • Conseil Fiscal
        • Pratique Japonaise
        • Services Notariaux
        • Résolution des Litiges
        • Fonds Offshore
        • Startups
        • Droit des Ainés
        • Regulatory Compliance, Investigations and Enforcement
        • Chinese Notary Services (CAAO)
  • Notre equipe
  • Actualités
  • Nos bureaux
Handwritten will

Ten Common Handwritten Will Mistakes

Featured Home

Ten Common Handwritten Will Mistakes

juin 17, 2024 by OLN Marketing

Handwritten wills i.e., holographic wills are valid in Hong Kong and in most jurisdictions around the world. Perhaps the most famous holographic will was that of Napoleon Bonaparte, who seemingly had plenty of time on his hands while exiled on the island of St Helena in 1821. He wrote a whopping five long pages and numerous codicils by hand, which was the requirement under French law for a valid will, in the absence of a notary. After praising his loved ones and lashing out at each of his political enemies, he bequeathed to over 7,500 beneficiaries the contents of his entire estate, down to a pair of slippers. The beneficiaries were not only his immediate family members but everyone from his General Montholon (2 million francs) to regular soldiers (100 francs each) in his army. It took the executors of his will 40 years to complete their tasks. 

Handwriting your own will is likely to be easier than the task that Napoleon undertook, but here are some of the more common (but not all of the) pitfalls to avoid:

1. Not appointing a willing executor

There will be no one to execute your wishes in this instance and this will lead to administrative delays. The beneficiary entitled to your residuary estate has first priority to apply to be your executor by virtue of rule 19 of the Non Contentious Probate Rules in Hong Kong where there is no named executor willing to take on this role. Your residuary estate is the whole sum of your estate after deduction of your debts, taxes, funeral, legal and administrative expenses and distribution of your cash and specific gifts to your beneficiaries.

2. Being too specific or not being specific enough

You may bequeath your Rolex Explorer II watch to your son but you own two Rolex watches at the time of your death, none of which is the Explorer II. You may state clearly “I bequeath my grand piano to my cousin.” but it transpires that you have three cousins (who coincidentally all play the piano up to grade 8 level) at the time of your death. These are examples of gifts that are too specific or not specific enough.

3. Not updating your will 

If you marry, divorce, enter into a committed relationship or any combination thereof, there may be significant impacts on the validity of parts of your will. Some committed relationships that may be recognised under overseas laws are not recognised in Hong Kong. It is important to review your will at regular intervals in order to take stock of significant changes in your relationships and assets.

4. Writing only one will when you have substantial assets in another jurisdiction

The legal concept of domicile may be different from your birthplace, nationality and/or jurisdiction where you have permanent residency. Your domicile at the time of death affects your will. You may write a will in Hong Kong that can be overridden due to laws in another jurisdiction that do not allow you to leave out certain beneficiaries, for instance. It is important to consider the laws of the countries where your substantial assets are located.

5. Writing wills in every jurisdiction you have assets in but inadvertently revoking some of the wills

You may have carefully considered all your worldly assets and handwritten your wills in accordance with where your assets are located. One common pitfall is not making reference to your other international wills, such that your last will and testament referring to your assets in Canada may inadvertently revoke your prior last will and testament referring to the distribution of your assets in Hong Kong.

6. Improper execution of the will

In Hong Kong, two witnesses are required when you sign your will. They and their spouses may not be your beneficiaries. Your executor may be a witness to your will but again, this executor should not be a beneficiary if such executor is to be a witness to your will. In the absence of proper execution, the court must be satisfied that there is no reasonable doubt your purported will satisfies your testamentary wishes.    

7. Forgetting to appoint guardians including temporary guardians for your minor children

If both parents pass away, minor children without appointed guardians will become wards of the Social Welfare Department. It is important to consider appointing temporary guardians who reside in Hong Kong in the event that permanent guardians are overseas, again to avoid having children becoming wards of the Social Welfare Department during the time it takes permanent guardians to arrive in Hong Kong.

8. Forgetting to include back up beneficiaries, executors and guardians

No one knows with certainty when their time will come. It is entirely possible to outlive one’s beneficiaries, executors and/or appointed guardians, especially the longer that one lives. Some care needs to be taken to think through some possible alternatives in the event that these persons predecease you or refuse to act as your executor or as guardians of your children.

9. Keeping the will in your own safety deposit box at the bank

This is a very safe place to keep your will but is it too safe? In Hong Kong, singly and jointly held safety deposit boxes require a “Certificate for Necessity of Inspection of Bank Deposit Box”  issued by the Home Affairs Department before a deceased’s safety deposit box may be inspected. A bank official and two public officers authorised by the Secretary for Home Affairs must be present during the inspection. Keeping one’s will in one’s own bank safety deposit box (even jointly held) leads to administrative delay and this should be weighed against the security afforded by a bank safekeeping your will.

10. Not signing your will

Many people take the time to carefully put together a will and then trip up on the final step – they omit to sign the will properly or put off signing the will. This may be due to any number of reasons – not prioritising this important final step (life often gets in the way) or even due to an inability to find witnesses for the will. Unfortunately, an unsigned will is an invalid will.

The legal requirements for a validly written will are both easy and difficult to fulfill – easy in the sense that a handwritten will showing intention and capacity signed by an adult which is properly witnessed is a legal document in Hong Kong, yet difficult because there are some common pitfalls that many a do-it-yourselfer has failed to avoid.

Beat Napoleon Bonaparte and have your will professionally drafted. To celebrate the inauguration of our groundbreaking Elder Law Practice (the first of its kind in Hong Kong), we are proud to relaunch our hugely popular FreeWill initiative, an opportunity for Hong Kongers to have their wills prepared for a nominal donation to a registered charity. To find out more, visit our FreeWill campaign page.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as legal advice, whether generally or for any specific person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: Non classifié(e), Probate and Estate Planning, Elder Law Practice Group Tagged With: Estate planning, Elder Law, Will

Handling Second-layer Recipients in Fraud Cases – Defence Concerning Underground Banking (地下錢莊/地下钱庄)

avril 8, 2024 by OLN Marketing

Introduction

In typical fraud cases, victims would find it difficult to trace the defrauded money because often case, the first-layer fraudsters would have dissipated fund elsewhere in a nano second, leaving their own bank balance with close to nothing. Victims therefore have to also sue the second-layer recipients to recover the lost fund. The fund transfers from the victims to the second-layer recipients, however, are not a direct one. Problem arises if the second-lawyer recipients come forth and defend the claim by arguing that they are equally innocent and their receipt of money was deriving from legitimate underlying transactions with the first-layer fraudsters.  

One of the most often cited defence by PRC second-layer recipients is that they engage service of Underground Banking (地下錢莊/地下钱庄) whereby they send money to a stranger in the PRC and in return obtain money from another stranger in Hong Kong. This explains why they would receive money from certain person not even their acquaintance as this is essentially the modus operandi of Underground Banking. It could be entirely credible that these second-layer recipients do not know the first-layer fraudsters personally (notwithstanding that they do transact with them) and that these second-layer recipients are truly irrelevant to the fraud scheme. In light of the prevalence of email and identity scam these years, such fact pattern and defence has become a common occurrence. Does that then mean that the victims’ claims against these second-layer recipients would be defeated?

As the Mainland practices foreign currency control, it is not uncommon for individuals in the Mainland to use underground banking for their outward remittance needs. While commonly used, such practice is inherently illegal under the relevant PRC administrative regulations and administrative measures on foreign exchange. Victims facing such defence raised by the second-layer recipients may therefore counter-argue in response that the use of underground banking itself constitutes an “illegality” and thus should not be given effect.

The Case Laws

OLN acted for the victim in the fraud claim Taihei Dengyo Kaisha Ltd v. Zhao Yizhe and another [2024] HKDC 222. The Plaintiff was a victim of an elaborate email scam, whereby after its funds were induced to be deposited into a fraudster’s account (first layer bank account), part of the funds were then dissipated from the first layer bank account to the second-layer recipient (i.e. 1st Defendant in the present case)). To recover the funds, the Plaintiff started a civil claim against the 1st Defendant based on the different causes of action including unjust enrichment and tracing.

In response to the Plaintiff’s unjust enrichment claim and tracing claim, the 1st Defendant raised the aforesaid defence concerning the use of Underground Banking, arguing that she received the funds due to her purchase of HKD with RMB through an exchange agent in the Mainland, and such constituted (1) defence of bona fide purchaser and (2) defence of change of position.

In the Plaintiff’s application for summary judgment against the 1st Defendant, the District Court has confirmed that in analyzing the issue of illegality, a distinction has to be made between domestic illegality and foreign illegality, and that the Court has different approach in handling the two types of illegality.

In view of the frequency of litigation in Hong Kong involving cross-border elements, especially regarding PRC law, this is a much welcome decision in confirming the Court’s readiness to grant judgment at summary stage where the defence concerns a transaction illegal under PRC law, and should discourage unmeritorious defences going to trial.

Summary Judgment

The District Court confirms that in respect of foreign illegality, the Court of Final Appeal decision in Ryder Industries Ltd v Chan Shui Woo [2015] 18 HKCFAR 544 (“Ryder”) is the highest authority in Hong Kong on how it affects the enforceability of contracts.

In respect of foreign illegality, the Court’s task is to identify which type of illegality the case falls within as follows:

  • Type 1: the contract is unenforceable under its proper law (whether chosen by the parties or otherwise)
  • Type 2: the performance of the contract requires or necessarily involves conduct which is illegal under the laws of the place where it is required to be performed
  • Type 3: the contract could have been performed in a legal manner but the real objective and intention of the parties at the time of concluding the contract necessitates them to perform by some act which is illegal by foreign law
  • Type 4: the actual performance of a contract may violate foreign laws, even though not required or initially intended, but nonetheless lead to the unenforceability of the contract before a Hong Kong court, regardless of its proper law

Following Ryder, if the transaction is identified as a Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3 case, the contract will not be given effect. If, on the other hand, it is a Type 4 case, the Court should make a judgment as to whether comity should require it to give effect to the contract or deny its enforcement by evaluating the seriousness of the illegality and the important policies which may underlie the impugned foreign law.

The Court found that as the 1st Defendant’s purchase of Hong Kong Dollars through the agent “necessarily” contravened PRC law as the very essence of the transactions was to circumvent PRC currency exchange controls, the transactions fall squarely within the Type 2 case. The Court was required to refuse enforcement of the contract, and the defence of change of position and bona fide purchaser would not therefore be available.

The Court also acknowledged that despite the issue of foreign illegality being a complicated and developing area of law, as Hong Kong case authorities have fairly established that it is illegal under PRC law to engage underground banking and there is no material dispute on the PRC law in the present case, the Court failed to see what utility can be gained for the restitution claim to go to trial.

The Court therefore granted summary judgment in favour of the Plaintiff against the 1st Defendant for the unjust enrichment claim for the amount of the sums received and a declaration that the 1st Defendant held the sums received on trust and/or constructive trust.

Key Takeaways

  • Regarding the issue of illegality, a distinction has to be made between domestic illegality and foreign illegality, as the Court would adopt different approaches regarding the enforceability of the underlying transaction.
  • Although foreign illegality remains a complicated and developing area of law, where Hong Kong case authorities have fairly established the relevant foreign illegality in issue and there is no material dispute regarding the foreign illegality in question, the Court may still be prepared to grant judgment at the summary stage.
  • Aside from a litigation standpoint, for individuals residing in Mainland who have outward remittance needs, whilst using underground banking or money exchange (地下錢莊/地下钱庄) may seem convenient, it is nonetheless an illegal practice in Mainland. More importantly, it carries the risk that there is no safeguard regarding the source of funds, and the funds received may well stem from innocent parties and be clawed back through legal proceedings.

Anna Chan, Kacy Lam and Dexter Yuen acted for the Plaintiff.

The full Judgment can be viewed here.

Filed Under: Fraude Commerciale et Recherche d'Avoirs, News Tagged With: Fraud, Underground banking, Scam

Oldham, Li & Nie Partner Wins the Private Client Lawyer of the Year at the 2024 Asia Legal Awards

mars 19, 2024 by OLN Marketing

We are delighted to announce that our partner and head of Private Client practice, Anna Chan, won the Private Client Lawyer of the Year at the 2024 Asia Legal Awards ceremony.

Anna received this prestigious title in recognition of her deep knowledge and expertise to guide clients through even the most complex contentious and non-contentious matters.

Anna Chan, OLN Partner, wins Private Client Lawyer of the Year at the 2024 Asia Legal Awards

The results were announced on 14 March 2024 at a ceremony in Singapore attended by Anna Chan and Martin Tse, Senior Associate.

In addition, Anna Chan was shortlisted in Litigator of the Year and Oldham, Li & Nie in Boutique Law Firm of the Year categories.

The Asia Legal Awards, hosted by Law.com International, a leading global media platform, honours the most outstanding legal practitioners, firms and transactions in Asia.

To learn more about Asia Legal Awards, see the complete lists of this year’s winners.

Filed Under: Non classifié(e), News, Probate and Estate Planning, Conseil Fiscal Tagged With: Estate planning, Private Client

Budget 2024/25: Updates on Stamp Duty on Property Transactions in Hong Kong

mars 7, 2024 by OLN Marketing

In the 2024/25 Budget (the “Budget”) delivered by the Financial Secretary of the HKSAR on 28 February 2024, a number of tax measures were proposed. Most notably, all demand-side management measures for residential properties have been cancelled with immediate effect, meaning that no (i) Special Stamp Duty (“SSD”), (ii) Buyer’s Stamp Duty (“BSD”) or (iii) Ad Valorem Stamp Duty (“AVD”) at 7.5% under Part 1 of Scale 1 of Head 1(1A), First Schedule of the Stamp Duty Ordinance (Cap. 117) (“SDO”) needs to be paid for any residential property transactions starting from 28 February 2024.


Property market in 2023

As illustrated in the Budget, insofar as a residential property is concerned, the market sentiment has become very cautious since the middle of 2023 in view of the rising interest rates and uncertainties in the external environment. In 2023, residential flat prices fell by 7% and the number of residential property transactions declined by 5% to a low level of around 43,000.

Cancellation of all “spicy measures”

It is under the backdrop of the property market’s weak performance that all “spicy measures”, including the SSD, BSD and AVD at 7.5% under Part 1 of Scale 1 were cancelled with immediate effect on 28 February 2024.
However, residential property purchasers would still have to pay AVD at the rate under Part I Scale 1 but such rate has been amended to be same as those of AVD under Scale 2 of Head 1(1A), First Schedule of the SDO (i.e., the rate for the sale and purchase of non-residential property on or after 26 November 2020) with effect from 28 February 2024, by way of the Public Revenue Protection (Stamp Duty) Order 2024 as discussed below.
In other words, for residential property transactions, AVD ranging from HK$100 to 4.25% of the stated consideration or the value of the property (whichever is higher) will be levied. The AVD rates immediately before and after 28 February 2024 are set out below:

Rate at Part 1 of Scale 1 from 25 October 2023 to 27 February 2024: Flat rate of 7.5%

Rate at Part 1 of Scale 1 on or after 28 February 2024:

Amount or value of the consideration or value of the property (whichever is higher)Rate at Part 1 of Scale 1
ExceedsDoes not exceed
 HK$3,000,000HK$100  
HK$3,000,000HK$3,528,240HK$100 + 10% of excess over HK$3,000,000
HK$3,528,240HK$4,500,0001.5%  
HK$4,500,000HK$4,935,480HK$67,500 + 10% of excess over HK$4,500,000
HK$4,935,480HK$6,000,0002.25%  
HK$6,000,000HK$6,642,860HK$135,000 + 10% of excess over HK$6,000,000
HK$6,642,860HK$9,000,0003.00%  
HK$9,000,000HK$10,080,000HK$270,000 + 10% of excess over HK$9,000,000
HK$10,080,000HK$20,000,0003.75%  
HK$20,000,000HK$21,739,120HK$750,000 + 10% of excess over HK$20,000,000
HK$21,739,120 4.25%  

Procedurally speaking, the Government will introduce the Stamp Duty (Amendment) Bill 2024 (the “Bill”) to the Legislative Council following the delivery of the Budget. In the meantime, to enable property purchasers to benefit from the said measures as soon as possible, the Chief Executive has exercised his statutory power to make the Public Revenue Protection (Stamp Duty) Order 2024 (the “Order”) under the Public Revenue Protection Ordinance (Cap. 120) to give full force and effect of law to the Bill before its enactment as long as the Order remains in force.

Potential impacts on the property market

All “spicy measures”, which aimed at curbing speculation and stabilizing housing prices, often deterred potential buyers due to the high additional costs involved in property transactions. With the removal of the “spicy measures”, we anticipate that the residential property market will experience a surge in activity. With the potential buyers having higher affordability, it is expected that the demand for residential flats will increase and property prices will potentially be driven up in the short term.

In particular, given that the BSD (which targeted purchasers who are non-Hong Kong permanent residents) is now removed, more foreign and Chinese investors might be attracted to invest in Hong Kong residential properties. Moreover, the abolishment of the SSD (which targeted reselling of residential properties within 24 months of acquisition) is likely to further stimulate the local second-hand property market.

Holding residential properties by corporate vehicles

One point to note is that the removal of “spicy measures” might prompt some potential purchasers (in particular, properties on the expensive end of the spectrum) to purchase residential properties through limited companies which are established for the sole purpose of holding the properties. When it comes to selling the properties, instead of selling the properties directly, property owners can sell the entire shares of the companies which hold the properties, to the purchasers.

The obvious advantage of using this strategy is that the stamp duty for the sale and purchase of shares of a limited company in Hong Kong is currently only 0.2% of the stated consideration or the value of the company (which essentially is the value of the property when the property is the only asset of the company), whichever the higher.

For example, if an individual decides to purchase a residential property valued at HK$7,000,000 after 28 February 2024, the calculations of stamp duty payable under different situations are as follows:

  • If the purchaser purchases the residential property directly, the stamp duty payable would be HK$7,000,000 x 3% = HK$210,000
  • If the residential property is held by the seller through a limited company whose only asset is the property, and the purchaser acquires the entire shares of the company, the stamp duty payable would be HK$7,000,000 x 0.2% = HK$14,000

Although the savings in stamp duty can be quite considerable by using the abovementioned strategy, it should be noted that:

  • Transfer of shares in a limited company involves more complicated procedures as compared to ordinary property transactions. Most notably, lawyers will be more heavily engaged in such equity transactions for procedures such as (i) due diligence to ensure that the company has not, amongst others, incurred any liabilities, and (ii) drafting the share purchase agreement including various representations, warranties and indemnity, to protect the interest of the purchaser. Hence, the associated legal fees would most likely be higher than that incurred in an ordinary property transaction.
  • After acquiring the company, the purchaser would have to pay annual maintenance costs to the company secretary and accountant for, among others, filing annual returns, convening annual general meetings, preparing audited accounts and doing tax filings to fulfill the statutory requirements.
  • Owing to legal complexity and risks as explained in point (1) above, banks usually do not offer mortgages for property transactions camouflaged by share transfers. Purchasers therefore need to be prepared to pay 100% of the purchase price of the company/property by the time the transaction is completed. A bridging loan might be required in the circumstances.

In view of the high associated costs that may be incurred in a share purchase transaction as discussed above, normally speaking, only residential properties of a relatively high value will justify the use of a limited company to hold the property.


If you have any question regarding the topic discussed above, please contact our partner Victor Ng at victor.ng@oln-law.com or our senior associate Barbara Kwong at barbara.kwong@oln-law.com for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or any legal advice for that matter to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.

Filed Under: Non classifié(e), News, Conseil Fiscal

Oldham, Li & Nie is Ranked in Chambers Greater China Region 2024 Guide

janvier 22, 2024 by OLN Marketing

The newly released 2024 edition of Chambers Greater China Region Guide acknowledged Oldham, Li & Nie in Corporate/M&A and Family/Matrimonial practice areas. Additionally, the Guide has spotlighted four of our lawyers as leading figures in the region’s legal landscape.

Chambers Greater China Region 2024 ranked firm Oldham, Li & Nie

Comments from clients include:

  • “Oldham, Li & Nie are extremely professional and reliable. Their lawyers are worldly, knowledgeable and respectful.”
  • “They are able to give practical advice by considering the circumstances of our company and our company’s primary commercial objectives.”
  • “They are highly professional and well organised. They are very efficient and speedy with their work.”

The four Odham, Li & Nie lawyers recognized among the premier lawyers in the Greater China region are:

  • Gordon Oldham – Corporate/M&A
  • Tracy Yip – Corporate/M&A
  • Richard Healy – Dispute Resolution: Litigation
  • Stephen Peaker – Family/Matrimonial

To view the OLN’s full rankings, visit our profile on 2024 Chambers Greater China Region.

About Chambers Greater China Region Guide

Chambers and Partners interview every year thousands of lawyers, clients and third-party experts to evaluate law firms’ and lawyers’ reputation and expertise in all four jurisdictions of the Greater China Region: PRC, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. The Chambers Greater China Region rankings assess various factors, including technical legal skills, professionalism, customer service, and business acumen of the leading lawyers across the region.

Filed Under: Non classifié(e), Droit des Sociétés et Droit Commercial, Résolution des Litiges, Droit de la Famille, News Tagged With: Corporate law, Award, Family law, Dispute Resolution

OLN Recommended by The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2024

novembre 24, 2023 by OLN Marketing

We are delighted to share that Oldham, Li & Nie has been recognised by The Legal 500 in its 2024 Asia Pacific edition in four practice areas:

  • Commercial, Corporate and M&A – Tier 3
  • Domestic and International Corporate Tax – Tier 3
  • Private Client and Family – Tier 3
  • Restructuring and Insolvency – Firm to Watch
Legal 500 APAC LEADING FIRM 2024

We are proud for our 14 lawyers who have been recommended by the directory this year:

Gordon Oldham, Senior Partner

Richard Healy, Partner

Stephen Peaker, Partner

Paul Firmin, Partner

Tracy Yip, Partner

Pamy Kuo, Partner

Anna Chan, Partner

Simon Wong, Partner

Yvonne Kong, Partner

Jonathan Lam, Partner

Victor Ng, Partner

Barbara Kwong, Senior Associate

Ivan Lee, Senior Associate

Gareth Leung, Associate

Our Intellectual Property consultancy, OLN IP Services, has also received a recognition by The Legal 500 directory this year.

Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2024 edition

Published annually, The Legal 500 Asia Pacific provides unbiased commentary and insight into the legal marketplaces of 25 Asia Pacific jurisdictions.

These rankings are the results of comprehensive analysis of law firm submissions and interviews with General Counsels and private practice lawyers.

The Legal 500’s research team also identifies the “Firms to Watch” to recognise the best up-and-coming practices.

Filed Under: Non classifié(e), News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more

Footer

OLN logo

Suite 503, 5/F, St George's Building
2 Ice House Street, Central
Hong Kong

Tel. +852 2868 0696 | Email us
À propos Notre equipe Nos bureaux OLN IP Services Politique de confidentialité
Domaines de pratique Actualités Carrières OLN Online
À propos Practice Areas Notre equipe Actualités Nos bureaux
Carrières OLN IP Services OLN Online Politique de confidentialité
linkedin twitter facebook
OLN logo

© 2025 Oldham, Li & Nie. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Contactez-nous

Veuillez partager les détails de votre message ici. Nous vous contacterons sous peu.

    x