Dispute Resolution

News & Articles
Dispute Resolution

Arbitration Beware: No Insolvency Petition

In his article “Lasmos and Beyond: Have the Cake and Eat it Too?”, our Litigation Partner Dantes Leung sets out to answer one intriguing and controversial legal question which is yet to be definitively ruled on by the Hong Kong Court: how should the court deal with an insolvency petition founded solely on an alleged debt that is the subject of an arbitration clause?  Dantes’ article navigates through the body of insolvency cases and probes and penetrates the different approaches taken by the common law courts.  It illuminates the issues presented by these approaches and how they may be reconciled, culminating in its central argument – also the inescapable conclusion – there is but one logical approach without having and eating the cake too: regardless of any steps taken under the arbitration clause, such a winding-up petition should be stayed or dismissed in the absence of an arbitral award.

Thorough and convincing, Dantes’ article provides unparalleled insights into the subject question and offering fresh perspectives on the plausibility and logicality (or the lack thereof) of the reasoning of the court approaches.  For the interested readers, Dantes’ article can be found in the link http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/lasmos-and-beyond-have-cake-and-eat-it-too.  

Please get in touch with Dantes ([email protected]) if you encounter similar issues and would like to know how you may improve your position in a winding-up petition hearing.  We are happy to assist.  
 

This website uses cookies to optimise your experience and to collect information to customise content. By closing this banner, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. Please read the cookies section of our Privacy Policy to learn more. Learn more
Accept