Suite 503, 5/F, St. George's Building, 2 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong
+852 2868 0696
The Rise of the Employer of Record in Hong Kong and How Businesses Can Leverage It
Introduction
Hong Kong’s employment landscape is changing. The recent amendment to the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) (“EO”), which introduces a broader continuous contract threshold from 18 January 2026, is one of several developments that should prompt businesses to take a closer look at how they structure and manage their workforce. For many, that review may well lead them to an increasingly familiar solution: the Employer of Record.
The Employer of Record (“EOR”) model is not new, but its profile in Hong Kong has grown considerably in recent years. Fuelled by the rise of cross-border hiring, more flexible workforce models, and a steady expansion of statutory employment obligations, more businesses are turning to EOR arrangements to simplify the way they engage workers. The appeal is understandable. There are, however, risks that businesses should plan against.
The EOR Model
An EOR is a third-party entity that formally acts as the employer on record of workers on behalf of a client company. In a typical EOR arrangement, the EOR signs the employment contract and handles payroll, MPF enrolment and contributions, employer tax reporting and other employment administration, while the client company retains day-to-day operational control over the workers’ activities.
The tripartite EOR structure is, in essence, as follows:
- The EOR employs the workers on paper and manages agreed compliance obligations;
- The client company directs the workers’ daily tasks and business activities; and
- The employees are formally contracted to the EOR but functionally serve the client.
The EOR model has found particular appeal among businesses seeking to expand into new markets without the delay and cost of establishing a local entity, as well as multinationals looking to centralise employment administration across jurisdictions.
The Benefits of EOR
In light of the new continuous contract framework, EOR arrangements offer a number of practical attractions for Hong Kong businesses.
- The EOR can take responsibility for monitoring evolving statutory requirements and managing outsourced compliance processes so that employment contracts, payroll systems and benefits structures reflect the applicable law.
- Businesses can engage talent quickly, without setting up a local entity and without having to build the full local employment administration infrastructure themselves. This can reduce costs and increase efficiency.
- The administrative burden on internal HR departments is also reduced. Payroll calculations, MPF enrolment and contributions, employer reporting to the Inland Revenue Department (“IRD”) under the salaries tax regime, and statutory leave tracking can all handled by the EOR.
- Companies considering a Hong Kong presence can hire locally on a trial basis through an EOR before committing to a formal corporate structure, allowing them to conduct market testing before committing capital and labour for the long term.
Key EOR Risks to Consider
Despite its commercial appeal, the EOR model carries meaningful legal and operational risks that businesses should evaluate carefully before proceeding.
1. Risk of Being Deemed the True Employer
Under Hong Kong law, the question of who is the “employer” for the purposes of the EO may turn on the substance of the relationship, not merely the label assigned to it. The courts and tribunals may examine the reality of the arrangement. If the client company:
- exercises substantial control over the worker’s day-to-day activities;
- provides the worker’s equipment, workspace, and tools;
- integrates the worker into its own organisational structure; or
- fails to maintain a meaningful distinction between its own staff and the EOR-engaged worker,
there is a risk that the client company may be found to be the worker’s true employer, depending on the facts, notwithstanding the contractual position with the EOR. This could expose the client to EO-related liabilities, including obligations relating to severance payment, statutory holiday pay, annual leave, sickness allowance and claims for unreasonable dismissal.
2. Employment Agency Regulations
The EOR model, if not properly structured, may also raise employment agency licensing issues. Employment agencies are regulated under the EO and the Employment Agency Regulations (Cap. 57A), and employment agencies must generally be licensed by the Labour Department. An EOR that functions essentially as a broker, by introducing or placing workers with client companies without genuinely acting as the substantive employer, may risk being treated as an unlicensed employment agency, with attendant regulatory and criminal exposure.
3. MPF and Salaries Tax Obligations
Even where an EOR arrangement is properly structured, client companies should satisfy themselves that the EOR is enrolling eligible employees in an MPF scheme within the statutory framework, making timely and correct MPF contributions, and filing accurate employer returns and related IR56 forms with the IRD. The statutory obligation to make MPF contributions sits with the employer of record, but reputational and operational risks can flow back to the client if an EOR defaults on these obligations.
4. Permanent Establishment Risk
For overseas companies engaging workers in Hong Kong through an EOR, there may also be Hong Kong profits tax risk if the worker’s activities constitute a permanent establishment in Hong Kong or otherwise result in Hong Kong sourced profit for Profits Tax purposes, particularly if they involve entering into contracts on the company’s behalf. Businesses should take advice on this risk before deploying an EOR arrangement, particularly where the engaged workers exercise significant commercial discretion.
5. Continuity of Employment and the “417/468 Rule”
Under the new framework, businesses that rotate EOR-engaged workers through consecutive contracts must be vigilant. From 18 January 2026, an employee is regarded as employed under a continuous contract if the employee has been continuously employed by the same employer for four weeks or more and either works at least 17 hours in each week or, where the employee works less than 17 hours in a week, has worked 68 hours or more in the four-week period comprising that week and the preceding three weeks. The “468 Rule” does not apply to the first three weeks of a new employment, and attempts to structure arrangements to avoid statutory entitlements may create additional legal and reputational risk.
How can OLN help?
OLN has extensive experience advising businesses, from market entrants to established multinationals, on the full spectrum of employment issues in Hong Kong. Whether you are considering an EOR arrangement for the first time, reviewing an existing structure for compliance risk, or navigating the implications of the new continuous contract framework, our team can help you assess your exposure and structure your workforce arrangements on a sound legal footing.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. Nothing herein shall be construed as Hong Kong legal advice or legal advice of any kind to any person. Oldham, Li & Nie shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damage incurred by any person acting as a result of the materials contained in this article.
Autore/i
